SVII
Price
$11.73
Change
-$0.07 (-0.59%)
Updated
Jun 16, 11:02 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
337.03M
TBMC
Price
$11.72
Change
+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jun 16, 12:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SVII vs TBMC

Header iconSVII vs TBMC Comparison
Open Charts SVII vs TBMCBanner chart's image
Spring Valley Acquisition
Price$11.73
Change-$0.07 (-0.59%)
Volume$100
Capitalization337.03M
Trailblazer Merger
Price$11.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Volume$171
Capitalization95.58M
SVII vs TBMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SVII vs. TBMC commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SVII is a StrongBuy and TBMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (SVII: $11.80 vs. TBMC: $11.70)
Brand notoriety: SVII and TBMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SVII: 180% vs. TBMC: 72%
Market capitalization -- SVII: $337.03M vs. TBMC: $95.58M
SVII [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $337.03M. TBMC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $95.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SVII’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SVII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SVII and TBMC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

SVII (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while TBMC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.25% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVII($337M) has a higher market cap than TBMC($95.6M). TBMC has higher P/E ratio than SVII: TBMC (55.79) vs SVII (35.66). TBMC YTD gains are higher at: 5.121 vs. SVII (4.796). TBMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -641.8K vs. SVII (-875.46K). SVII has more cash in the bank: 1.24M vs. TBMC (676K). SVII has less debt than TBMC: SVII (269K) vs TBMC (325K). SVII (0) and TBMC (0) have equivalent revenues.
SVIITBMCSVII / TBMC
Capitalization337M95.6M353%
EBITDA-875.46K-641.8K136%
Gain YTD4.7965.12194%
P/E Ratio35.6655.7964%
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.24M676K184%
Total Debt269K325K83%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDP14.250.18
+1.28%
ProShares UltraShort Utilities
CVY25.78-0.10
-0.40%
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
DLN80.40-0.70
-0.86%
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
FYX93.66-1.92
-2.01%
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX® ETF
DRIV22.51-0.51
-2.22%
Global X Atnms & Elctrc Vhcls ETF

SVII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVII and QETAU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVII and QETAU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVII
1D Price
Change %
SVII100%
+0.68%
QETAU - SVII
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
VOYA - SVII
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
AIMUF - SVII
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBMC - SVII
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
DIST - SVII
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TBMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBMC has been loosely correlated with CLBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBMC jumps, then CLBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBMC
1D Price
Change %
TBMC100%
-0.13%
CLBR - TBMC
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
ISRL - TBMC
27%
Poorly correlated
+7.28%
ELLH - TBMC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIMTF - TBMC
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMC - TBMC
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More