Advertisement
SUTNY vs WF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUTNY is a Hold and WF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SUTNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- SUTNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SUTNY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SUTNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
SUTNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.
Reported Earning Dates
WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| SUTNY | WF | SUTNY / WF | |
| Capitalization | 18.8B | 13.1B | 144% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.957 | 76.923 | 21% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.42 | 6.96 | 150% |
| Revenue | 1.52T | 12.85T | 12% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 18.57T | 80.55T | 23% |
SUTNY | WF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 1 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 97 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WF's Valuation (66) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SUTNY (83) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.
WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SUTNY (14) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.
WF's SMR Rating (100) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SUTNY (100) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.
SUTNY's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as WF (97) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SUTNY’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.
WF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUTNY (95) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.
| SUTNY | WF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 66% | 9 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VYLD | 26.44 | 0.43 | +1.64% |
| Inverse Vix Short-Term Futures Etns Due March 22, 2045 | |||
| REZ | 84.17 | 0.74 | +0.89% |
| iShares Residential & Multisector RE ETF | |||
| USL | 33.41 | 0.14 | +0.43% |
| United States 12 Month Oil | |||
| BSMU | 22.06 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2030 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| XLU | 91.57 | -0.32 | -0.35% |
| The Utilities Select Sector SPDR® ETF | |||
SUTNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUTNY has been closely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUTNY jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUTNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUTNY | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| MFG - SUTNY | 71% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| DBSDY - SUTNY | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| WF - SUTNY | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| ONB - SUTNY | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
| SHG - SUTNY | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
More | ||||
WF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WF | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| SHG - WF | 76% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| KB - WF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| SBNY - WF | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DBSDY - WF | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| SUTNY - WF | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||