SUTNY
Price
$5.52
Change
+$0.07 (+1.28%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.28B
SWDBF
Price
$27.73
Change
+$1.36 (+5.16%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
20.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SUTNY vs SWDBF

Header iconSUTNY vs SWDBF Comparison
Open Charts SUTNY vs SWDBFBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$5.52
Change+$0.07 (+1.28%)
Volume$50.41K
Capitalization14.28B
Swedbank AB
Price$27.73
Change+$1.36 (+5.16%)
Volume$187
Capitalization20.6B
SUTNY vs SWDBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SUTNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWDBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUTNY vs. SWDBF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUTNY is a StrongBuy and SWDBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SUTNY: $5.52 vs. SWDBF: $27.73)
Brand notoriety: SUTNY and SWDBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUTNY: 43% vs. SWDBF: 7%
Market capitalization -- SUTNY: $14.28B vs. SWDBF: $20.6B
SUTNY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.28B. SWDBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $20.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUTNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWDBF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SUTNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWDBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWDBF is a better buy in the long-term than SUTNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SUTNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWDBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SUTNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SWDBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWDBF is a better buy in the short-term than SUTNY.

Price Growth

SUTNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.22% price change this week, while SWDBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWDBF($20.6B) has a higher market cap than SUTNY($14.3B). SUTNY has higher P/E ratio than SWDBF: SUTNY (10.30) vs SWDBF (7.49). SWDBF YTD gains are higher at: 42.766 vs. SUTNY (17.447). SWDBF has less debt than SUTNY: SWDBF (965B) vs SUTNY (17.12T). SUTNY has higher revenues than SWDBF: SUTNY (1.14T) vs SWDBF (65.5B).
SUTNYSWDBFSUTNY / SWDBF
Capitalization14.3B20.6B69%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.44742.76641%
P/E Ratio10.307.49137%
Revenue1.14T65.5B1,737%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt17.12T965B1,774%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUTNY vs SWDBF: Fundamental Ratings
SUTNY
SWDBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1022
SMR RATING
1..100
1002
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUTNY's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SWDBF (78). This means that SUTNY’s stock grew similarly to SWDBF’s over the last 12 months.

SUTNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SWDBF (22). This means that SUTNY’s stock grew similarly to SWDBF’s over the last 12 months.

SWDBF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUTNY (100). This means that SWDBF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

SWDBF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SUTNY (46). This means that SWDBF’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

SWDBF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUTNY (98). This means that SWDBF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUTNYSWDBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUTNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWDBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CUK27.200.37
+1.38%
Carnival PLC
BRLS3.630.03
+0.83%
Borealis Foods
CSCI3.41N/A
N/A
COSCIENS Biopharma Inc
HESM38.21-0.16
-0.42%
Hess Midstream LP
CCRN13.01-0.08
-0.61%
Cross Country Healthcare

SUTNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUTNY has been loosely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SUTNY jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUTNY
1D Price
Change %
SUTNY100%
+1.38%
MFG - SUTNY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
DBSDY - SUTNY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
CCRDF - SUTNY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWDBY - SUTNY
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
ISNPY - SUTNY
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More

SWDBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWDBF and NACB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWDBF and NACB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWDBF
1D Price
Change %
SWDBF100%
N/A
NACB - SWDBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCRDF - SWDBF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWZNF - SWDBF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUTNY - SWDBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
SWDBY - SWDBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More