Advertisement
SURG vs TCYSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SURG is a Hold and TCYSF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SURG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCYSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SURG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TCYSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SURG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCYSF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SURG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TCYSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
SURG (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -6.54% price change this week, while TCYSF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.33%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
SURG is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+0.34% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
@Packaged Software (-0.88% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| SURG | TCYSF | SURG / TCYSF | |
| Capitalization | 39.5M | 366M | 11% |
| EBITDA | -47.11M | 11.5M | -410% |
| Gain YTD | 36.517 | -25.661 | -142% |
| P/E Ratio | 38.25 | 115.60 | 33% |
| Revenue | 36.5M | 180M | 20% |
| Total Cash | 4.4M | 31M | 14% |
| Total Debt | 10M | 646K | 1,548% |
SURG | TCYSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TCYSF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SURG (99). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew significantly faster than SURG’s over the last 12 months.
TCYSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SURG (100). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew similarly to SURG’s over the last 12 months.
TCYSF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SURG (99). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew similarly to SURG’s over the last 12 months.
SURG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as TCYSF (76). This means that SURG’s stock grew similarly to TCYSF’s over the last 12 months.
SURG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCYSF (98). This means that SURG’s stock grew significantly faster than TCYSF’s over the last 12 months.
| SURG | TCYSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
SURG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SURG has been loosely correlated with TGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SURG jumps, then TGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SURG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SURG | 100% | -14.74% | ||
| TGL - SURG | 37% Loosely correlated | +6.36% | ||
| RSKD - SURG | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| RXT - SURG | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| PCOR - SURG | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| SKLZ - SURG | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
More | ||||
TCYSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TCYSF and TMICY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCYSF and TMICY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCYSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCYSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TMICY - TCYSF | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| SQNXF - TCYSF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UBSFF - TCYSF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SURG - TCYSF | 0% Poorly correlated | -14.74% | ||
| STBEF - TCYSF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||