SURDF
Price
$38.64
Change
+$0.08 (+0.21%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.81B
TTUUF
Price
$6.77
Change
-$0.51 (-7.01%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SURDF vs TTUUF

Header iconSURDF vs TTUUF Comparison
Open Charts SURDF vs TTUUFBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Realty & Development
Price$38.64
Change+$0.08 (+0.21%)
Volume$252
Capitalization12.81B
Tokyu Fudosan Holdings
Price$6.77
Change-$0.51 (-7.01%)
Volume$597
Capitalization4.26B
SURDF vs TTUUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SURDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTUUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SURDF vs. TTUUF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SURDF is a Hold and TTUUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SURDF: $38.64 vs. TTUUF: $6.77)
Brand notoriety: SURDF and TTUUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SURDF: 57% vs. TTUUF: 54%
Market capitalization -- SURDF: $12.81B vs. TTUUF: $4.26B
SURDF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $12.81B. TTUUF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $4.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SURDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTUUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SURDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTUUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTUUF is a better buy in the long-term than SURDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SURDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTUUF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SURDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TTUUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTUUF is a better buy in the short-term than SURDF.

Price Growth

SURDF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.21% price change this week, while TTUUF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +31.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+31.42% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SURDF($12.8B) has a higher market cap than TTUUF($4.26B). TTUUF has higher P/E ratio than SURDF: TTUUF (12.05) vs SURDF (10.91). SURDF YTD gains are higher at: 22.309 vs. TTUUF (10.711). SURDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 247B vs. TTUUF (72.5B). SURDF has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. TTUUF (145B). TTUUF has less debt than SURDF: TTUUF (1.51T) vs SURDF (3.68T). TTUUF has higher revenues than SURDF: TTUUF (997B) vs SURDF (925B).
SURDFTTUUFSURDF / TTUUF
Capitalization12.8B4.26B301%
EBITDA247B72.5B341%
Gain YTD22.30910.711208%
P/E Ratio10.9112.0591%
Revenue925B997B93%
Total Cash161B145B111%
Total Debt3.68T1.51T245%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SURDF vs TTUUF: Fundamental Ratings
SURDF
TTUUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4735
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5983
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTUUF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SURDF (81). This means that TTUUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SURDF’s over the last 12 months.

TTUUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SURDF (47). This means that TTUUF’s stock grew similarly to SURDF’s over the last 12 months.

TTUUF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SURDF (100). This means that TTUUF’s stock grew similarly to SURDF’s over the last 12 months.

SURDF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as TTUUF (60). This means that SURDF’s stock grew similarly to TTUUF’s over the last 12 months.

SURDF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as TTUUF (83). This means that SURDF’s stock grew similarly to TTUUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SURDFTTUUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SURDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTUUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SENEB107.994.99
+4.84%
Seneca Foods Corp
RILYL2.160.06
+2.86%
B. Riley Financial
FOLD6.100.15
+2.52%
Amicus Therapeutics
MLI82.64-0.51
-0.61%
Mueller Industries
ELTK10.28-0.10
-0.96%
Eltek Ltd

SURDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SURDF has been loosely correlated with SRRLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SURDF jumps, then SRRLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SURDF
1D Price
Change %
SURDF100%
N/A
SRRLF - SURDF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTOUF - SURDF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRGTF - SURDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
MITEF - SURDF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRUNF - SURDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
More

TTUUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TTUUF and IFSUF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTUUF and IFSUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTUUF
1D Price
Change %
TTUUF100%
N/A
IFSUF - TTUUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAGOF - TTUUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURDF - TTUUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOLGY - TTUUF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
SVAUF - TTUUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More