SURDF
Price
$43.76
Change
-$2.74 (-5.89%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
20.61B
SWPFF
Price
$2.75
Change
+$0.04 (+1.48%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
15.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SURDF vs SWPFF

Header iconSURDF vs SWPFF Comparison
Open Charts SURDF vs SWPFFBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Realty & Development
Price$43.76
Change-$2.74 (-5.89%)
Volume$443
Capitalization20.61B
Swire Properties
Price$2.75
Change+$0.04 (+1.48%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization15.89B
SURDF vs SWPFF Comparison Chart in %
SURDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SURDF vs. SWPFF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SURDF is a Hold and SWPFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (SURDF: $43.76 vs. SWPFF: $2.75)
Brand notoriety: SURDF and SWPFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SURDF: 97% vs. SWPFF: 284%
Market capitalization -- SURDF: $20.61B vs. SWPFF: $15.89B
SURDF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $20.61B. SWPFF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $15.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SURDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWPFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SURDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWPFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SURDF and SWPFF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SURDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWPFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SURDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWPFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWPFF is a better buy in the short-term than SURDF.

Price Growth

SURDF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -5.89% price change this week, while SWPFF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.19% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SURDF($20.6B) has a higher market cap than SWPFF($15.9B). SWPFF has higher P/E ratio than SURDF: SWPFF (38.23) vs SURDF (16.31). SURDF YTD gains are higher at: 38.516 vs. SWPFF (36.476). SURDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 352B vs. SWPFF (-1.06B). SURDF has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. SWPFF (13.3B). SWPFF has less debt than SURDF: SWPFF (56.1B) vs SURDF (3.87T). SURDF has higher revenues than SWPFF: SURDF (1T) vs SWPFF (15.9B).
SURDFSWPFFSURDF / SWPFF
Capitalization20.6B15.9B130%
EBITDA352B-1.06B-33,365%
Gain YTD38.51636.476106%
P/E Ratio16.3138.2343%
Revenue1T15.9B6,302%
Total Cash74.1B13.3B557%
Total Debt3.87T56.1B6,898%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SURDF vs SWPFF: Fundamental Ratings
SURDF
SWPFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9333
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4293
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1533
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SWPFF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SURDF (94). This means that SWPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than SURDF’s over the last 12 months.

SURDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWPFF (93). This means that SURDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWPFF’s over the last 12 months.

SWPFF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as SURDF (100). This means that SWPFF’s stock grew similarly to SURDF’s over the last 12 months.

SWPFF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SURDF (46). This means that SWPFF’s stock grew similarly to SURDF’s over the last 12 months.

SURDF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as SWPFF (33). This means that SURDF’s stock grew similarly to SWPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SURDFSWPFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
33%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SURDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASIA33.980.04
+0.11%
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
MEGI14.82-0.01
-0.07%
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends Term Fund
SMH342.83-0.47
-0.14%
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
CNRG95.70-2.23
-2.28%
SPDR® Kensho Clean Power ETF
NODE44.05-1.10
-2.44%
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF

SURDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SURDF has been loosely correlated with SRRLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SURDF jumps, then SRRLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SURDF
1D Price
Change %
SURDF100%
N/A
SRRLF - SURDF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRGTF - SURDF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWPFF - SURDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVAUF - SURDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A

SWPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWPFF and CLILF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWPFF and CLILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWPFF
1D Price
Change %
SWPFF100%
N/A
CLILF - SWPFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBUV - SWPFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGTF - SWPFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURDF - SWPFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVAUF - SWPFF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A