SUMXF
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.06 (-2.03%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
125.03M
WIPKF
Price
$32.40
Change
-$0.19 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SUMXF vs WIPKF

Header iconSUMXF vs WIPKF Comparison
Open Charts SUMXF vs WIPKFBanner chart's image
Supremex
Price$2.90
Change-$0.06 (-2.03%)
Volume$200
Capitalization125.03M
Winpak
Price$32.40
Change-$0.19 (-0.58%)
Volume$2.12K
Capitalization1.99B
SUMXF vs WIPKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WIPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUMXF vs. WIPKF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUMXF is a Hold and WIPKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (SUMXF: $2.90 vs. WIPKF: $32.40)
Brand notoriety: SUMXF and WIPKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUMXF: 10% vs. WIPKF: 79%
Market capitalization -- SUMXF: $125.03M vs. WIPKF: $1.99B
SUMXF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $125.03M. WIPKF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $1.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUMXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWIPKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SUMXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WIPKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUMXF is a better buy in the long-term than WIPKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SUMXF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WIPKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SUMXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WIPKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SUMXF is a better buy in the short-term than WIPKF.

Price Growth

SUMXF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WIPKF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+1.91% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WIPKF($1.99B) has a higher market cap than SUMXF($125M). WIPKF has higher P/E ratio than SUMXF: WIPKF (14.35) vs SUMXF (5.19). SUMXF YTD gains are higher at: 12.840 vs. WIPKF (-2.994). WIPKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 239M vs. SUMXF (61.4M). WIPKF has more cash in the bank: 455M vs. SUMXF (2.12M). WIPKF has less debt than SUMXF: WIPKF (12.5M) vs SUMXF (117M). WIPKF has higher revenues than SUMXF: WIPKF (1.19B) vs SUMXF (298M).
SUMXFWIPKFSUMXF / WIPKF
Capitalization125M1.99B6%
EBITDA61.4M239M26%
Gain YTD12.840-2.994-429%
P/E Ratio5.1914.3536%
Revenue298M1.19B25%
Total Cash2.12M455M0%
Total Debt117M12.5M936%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUMXF vs WIPKF: Fundamental Ratings
SUMXF
WIPKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
9364
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1659
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUMXF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WIPKF (88). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew significantly faster than WIPKF’s over the last 12 months.

SUMXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WIPKF (100). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WIPKF’s over the last 12 months.

WIPKF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMXF (93). This means that WIPKF’s stock grew similarly to SUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

WIPKF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMXF (53). This means that WIPKF’s stock grew similarly to SUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

SUMXF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WIPKF (59). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WIPKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUMXFWIPKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WIPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTDCX16.100.09
+0.56%
Russell Inv Multifactor US Equity C
GSPQX17.500.08
+0.44%
Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium C
DBMAX28.560.05
+0.18%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr A
SGIIX77.010.08
+0.10%
First Eagle Global I
SASVX6.29N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Eq A

SUMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUMXF and WIPKF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUMXF and WIPKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUMXF
1D Price
Change %
SUMXF100%
N/A
WIPKF - SUMXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
TCLAF - SUMXF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
SW - SUMXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
VKSC - SUMXF
1%
Poorly correlated
+18.18%
RPKIF - SUMXF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WIPKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WIPKF and SUMXF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WIPKF and SUMXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WIPKF
1D Price
Change %
WIPKF100%
-0.58%
SUMXF - WIPKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPKIF - WIPKF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCLAF - WIPKF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
SW - WIPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
MNHFF - WIPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More