SUMXF
Price
$3.12
Change
-$0.09 (-2.80%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
78.34M
TCLAF
Price
$14.74
Change
-$0.06 (-0.41%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SUMXF vs TCLAF

Header iconSUMXF vs TCLAF Comparison
Open Charts SUMXF vs TCLAFBanner chart's image
Supremex
Price$3.12
Change-$0.09 (-2.80%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization78.34M
Transcontinental
Price$14.74
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization1.23B
SUMXF vs TCLAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUMXF vs. TCLAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUMXF is a Hold and TCLAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SUMXF: $3.12 vs. TCLAF: $14.74)
Brand notoriety: SUMXF and TCLAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUMXF: 183% vs. TCLAF: 12%
Market capitalization -- SUMXF: $78.34M vs. TCLAF: $1.23B
SUMXF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $78.34M. TCLAF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUMXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTCLAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SUMXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TCLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUMXF is a better buy in the long-term than TCLAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SUMXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCLAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SUMXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TCLAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TCLAF is a better buy in the short-term than SUMXF.

Price Growth

SUMXF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -2.93% price change this week, while TCLAF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-0.33% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCLAF($1.23B) has a higher market cap than SUMXF($78.3M). TCLAF (9.50) and SUMXF (9.22) have similar P/E ratio . TCLAF YTD gains are higher at: 25.934 vs. SUMXF (21.245). TCLAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 498M vs. SUMXF (10.5M). TCLAF has more cash in the bank: 43.2M vs. SUMXF (2.06M). SUMXF has less debt than TCLAF: SUMXF (81.6M) vs TCLAF (843M). TCLAF has higher revenues than SUMXF: TCLAF (2.78B) vs SUMXF (275M).
SUMXFTCLAFSUMXF / TCLAF
Capitalization78.3M1.23B6%
EBITDA10.5M498M2%
Gain YTD21.24525.93482%
P/E Ratio9.229.5097%
Revenue275M2.78B10%
Total Cash2.06M43.2M5%
Total Debt81.6M843M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUMXF vs TCLAF: Fundamental Ratings
SUMXF
TCLAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3325
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5774
SMR RATING
1..100
9572
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1691
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUMXF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLAF (21). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew similarly to TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

SUMXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLAF (74). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew similarly to TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMXF (95). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to SUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMXF (49). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to SUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

SUMXF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCLAF (91). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew significantly faster than TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUMXFTCLAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MITSF25.430.87
+3.54%
Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
HLFFF8.75N/A
N/A
Hellofresh SE
SKHRF0.62N/A
N/A
Stakeholder Gold Corp.
RSNUF0.03N/A
N/A
RENASCOR RES LTD.
YOKEY59.00-0.05
-0.08%
Yokogawa Electric Co.

SUMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUMXF and WIPKF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUMXF and WIPKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUMXF
1D Price
Change %
SUMXF100%
-2.93%
WIPKF - SUMXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCLAF - SUMXF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - SUMXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
VKSC - SUMXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPKIF - SUMXF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TCLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLAF and CCDBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLAF and CCDBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCLAF
1D Price
Change %
TCLAF100%
N/A
CCDBF - TCLAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
SUMXF - TCLAF
19%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
RPKIF - TCLAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VKSC - TCLAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - TCLAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More