SUCEF
Price
$26.93
Change
+$0.88 (+3.38%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
869.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WBRBY
Price
$6.64
Change
+$0.23 (+3.59%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.78B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SUCEF vs WBRBY

Header iconSUCEF vs WBRBY Comparison
Open Charts SUCEF vs WBRBYBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Osaka Cement
Price$26.93
Change+$0.88 (+3.38%)
Volume$600
Capitalization869.67M
Wienerberger Baustoffindustrie AG
Price$6.64
Change+$0.23 (+3.59%)
Volume$1.49K
Capitalization3.78B
SUCEF vs WBRBY Comparison Chart in %
SUCEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WBRBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUCEF vs. WBRBY commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUCEF is a Hold and WBRBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (SUCEF: $26.04 vs. WBRBY: $6.64)
Brand notoriety: SUCEF and WBRBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUCEF: 56% vs. WBRBY: 12%
Market capitalization -- SUCEF: $869.67M vs. WBRBY: $3.78B
SUCEF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $869.67M. WBRBY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $81.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $11.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUCEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWBRBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SUCEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WBRBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WBRBY is a better buy in the long-term than SUCEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SUCEF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBRBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SUCEF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WBRBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WBRBY is a better buy in the short-term than SUCEF.

Price Growth

SUCEF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WBRBY (@Construction Materials) price change was -4.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

WBRBY is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.24% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBRBY($3.78B) has a higher market cap than SUCEF($870M). WBRBY has higher P/E ratio than SUCEF: WBRBY (15.14) vs SUCEF (9.76). SUCEF YTD gains are higher at: -3.305 vs. WBRBY (-7.651). SUCEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 43B vs. WBRBY (750M). SUCEF has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. WBRBY (232M). SUCEF has higher revenues than WBRBY: SUCEF (217B) vs WBRBY (4.65B).
SUCEFWBRBYSUCEF / WBRBY
Capitalization870M3.78B23%
EBITDA43B750M5,733%
Gain YTD-3.305-7.65143%
P/E Ratio9.7615.1464%
Revenue217B4.65B4,671%
Total Cash15B232M6,466%
Total Debt82.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUCEF vs WBRBY: Fundamental Ratings
SUCEF
WBRBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9884
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
9980
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WBRBY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SUCEF (7). This means that WBRBY’s stock grew similarly to SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

WBRBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SUCEF (100). This means that WBRBY’s stock grew similarly to SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

WBRBY's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SUCEF (99). This means that WBRBY’s stock grew similarly to SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

WBRBY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SUCEF (72). This means that WBRBY’s stock grew similarly to SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

SUCEF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as WBRBY (98). This means that SUCEF’s stock grew similarly to WBRBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUCEFWBRBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUCEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WBRBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AATSX20.000.10
+0.50%
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
ICFSX9.300.01
+0.11%
ICON Consumer Select Institutional
FAFDX38.11N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Financials A
MFRBX46.30-0.50
-1.07%
MFS Research B
HCMNX22.60-0.25
-1.09%
HCM Sector Plus A

SUCEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUCEF and XYIGY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUCEF and XYIGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUCEF
1D Price
Change %
SUCEF100%
N/A
XYIGY - SUCEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - SUCEF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
XYIGF - SUCEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSND - SUCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCHNF - SUCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WBRBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WBRBY and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBRBY and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBRBY
1D Price
Change %
WBRBY100%
-1.70%
HCMLY - WBRBY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
HDLMY - WBRBY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
CXMSF - WBRBY
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
XYIGY - WBRBY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYIGF - WBRBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More