SU
Price
$49.76
Change
+$0.79 (+1.61%)
Updated
Jan 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
58.87B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XOM
Price
$129.88
Change
+$0.75 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jan 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
544.56B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SU vs XOM

Header iconSU vs XOM Comparison
Open Charts SU vs XOMBanner chart's image
Suncor Energy
Price$49.76
Change+$0.79 (+1.61%)
Volume$45.02K
Capitalization58.87B
Exxon Mobil
Price$129.88
Change+$0.75 (+0.58%)
Volume$76.99K
Capitalization544.56B
SU vs XOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SU vs. XOM commentary
Jan 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SU is a Hold and XOM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 17, 2026
Stock price -- (SU: $48.97 vs. XOM: $129.13)
Brand notoriety: SU and XOM are both notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SU: 65% vs. XOM: 105%
Market capitalization -- SU: $58.87B vs. XOM: $544.56B
SU [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $58.87B. XOM’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $544.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $544.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SU’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileXOM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • XOM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the long-term than XOM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XOM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XOM is a better buy in the short-term than SU.

Price Growth

SU (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +6.99% price change this week, while XOM (@Integrated Oil) price change was +5.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

SU is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

XOM is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+1.41% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOM($545B) has a higher market cap than SU($58.9B). XOM has higher P/E ratio than SU: XOM (18.77) vs SU (15.85). SU YTD gains are higher at: 10.392 vs. XOM (7.304). XOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 68.7B vs. SU (14.7B). XOM has more cash in the bank: 13.8B vs. SU (2.94B). SU has less debt than XOM: SU (14.5B) vs XOM (42B). XOM has higher revenues than SU: XOM (325B) vs SU (53.3B).
SUXOMSU / XOM
Capitalization58.9B545B11%
EBITDA14.7B68.7B21%
Gain YTD10.3927.304142%
P/E Ratio15.8518.7784%
Revenue53.3B325B16%
Total Cash2.94B13.8B21%
Total Debt14.5B42B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SU vs XOM: Fundamental Ratings
SU
XOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2322
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
246
SMR RATING
1..100
6465
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4117
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1221
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SU's Valuation (32) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XOM (81). This means that SU’s stock grew somewhat faster than XOM’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (24). This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's SMR Rating (64) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as XOM (65). This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to XOM’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (41). This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as XOM (21). This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to XOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUXOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPRE20.140.14
+0.70%
SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF
ONEY120.470.70
+0.58%
State Street® SPDR® Russell 1000 YFocETF
SCHF25.050.04
+0.16%
Schwab International Equity ETF™
PYPY39.910.05
+0.12%
YieldMax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF
XLEI24.70-0.13
-0.52%
State Street®EngySelSectSPDR®PrmETF

SU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SU has been closely correlated with CVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SU jumps, then CVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SU
1D Price
Change %
SU100%
-1.37%
CVE - SU
81%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
IMO - SU
79%
Closely correlated
-2.64%
SHEL - SU
76%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
XOM - SU
75%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
BP - SU
72%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
More

XOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOM has been closely correlated with CVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOM jumps, then CVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOM
1D Price
Change %
XOM100%
-0.82%
CVX - XOM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
SHEL - XOM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
SU - XOM
74%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
CVE - XOM
73%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
EQNR - XOM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
More