SU
Price
$38.88
Change
-$0.11 (-0.28%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
47.45B
74 days until earnings call
XOM
Price
$106.49
Change
-$0.89 (-0.83%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
457.79B
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SU vs XOM

Header iconSU vs XOM Comparison
Open Charts SU vs XOMBanner chart's image
Suncor Energy
Price$38.88
Change-$0.11 (-0.28%)
Volume$1.97M
Capitalization47.45B
Exxon Mobil
Price$106.49
Change-$0.89 (-0.83%)
Volume$19.27M
Capitalization457.79B
SU vs XOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SU vs. XOM commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SU is a Hold and XOM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (SU: $38.99 vs. XOM: $107.38)
Brand notoriety: SU and XOM are both notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SU: 47% vs. XOM: 79%
Market capitalization -- SU: $47.45B vs. XOM: $457.79B
SU [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $47.45B. XOM’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $457.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $457.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $56.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SU’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileXOM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • XOM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the long-term than XOM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XOM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XOM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the short-term than XOM.

Price Growth

SU (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -0.10% price change this week, while XOM (@Integrated Oil) price change was +1.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

SU is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

XOM is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+0.61% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOM($458B) has a higher market cap than SU($47.5B). XOM has higher P/E ratio than SU: XOM (15.25) vs SU (11.83). SU YTD gains are higher at: 9.277 vs. XOM (1.644). XOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 73.4B vs. SU (15.9B). XOM has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. SU (2.77B). SU has less debt than XOM: SU (14.8B) vs XOM (37.6B). XOM has higher revenues than SU: XOM (340B) vs SU (54.9B).
SUXOMSU / XOM
Capitalization47.5B458B10%
EBITDA15.9B73.4B22%
Gain YTD9.2771.644564%
P/E Ratio11.8315.2578%
Revenue54.9B340B16%
Total Cash2.77B17B16%
Total Debt14.8B37.6B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SU vs XOM: Fundamental Ratings
SU
XOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6055
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
338
SMR RATING
1..100
5858
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2941
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SU's Valuation (28) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XOM (82). This means that SU’s stock grew somewhat faster than XOM’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (33). This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's SMR Rating (58) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (58). This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as XOM (60). This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to XOM’s over the last 12 months.

SU's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as XOM (41). This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to XOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUXOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGN4.610.01
+0.11%
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust
IVVW45.770.01
+0.02%
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
GSLC126.50-0.10
-0.08%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US LgCp Eq ETF
FCUS27.49-0.45
-1.61%
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
CVNY40.91-0.99
-2.36%
YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF

SU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SU has been closely correlated with CVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SU jumps, then CVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SU
1D Price
Change %
SU100%
+0.13%
CVE - SU
82%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
IMO - SU
79%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
XOM - SU
78%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
SHEL - SU
78%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
CVX - SU
76%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
More

XOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOM has been closely correlated with CVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOM jumps, then CVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOM
1D Price
Change %
XOM100%
-0.20%
CVX - XOM
82%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
SU - XOM
77%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
SHEL - XOM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
CVE - XOM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
IMO - XOM
68%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
More