STZ
Price
$159.00
Change
+$2.64 (+1.69%)
Updated
Jan 15, 12:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.11B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TAP
Price
$50.51
Change
+$0.02 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jan 15, 12:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.98B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

STZ vs TAP

Header iconSTZ vs TAP Comparison
Open Charts STZ vs TAPBanner chart's image
Constellation Brands
Price$159.00
Change+$2.64 (+1.69%)
Volume$3.34K
Capitalization27.11B
Molson Coors Beverage
Price$50.51
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization9.98B
STZ vs TAP Comparison Chart in %
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STZ vs. TAP commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STZ is a Hold and TAP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (STZ: $156.36 vs. TAP: $50.49)
Brand notoriety: STZ and TAP are both notable
Both companies represent the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STZ: 133% vs. TAP: 70%
Market capitalization -- STZ: $27.11B vs. TAP: $9.98B
STZ [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] is valued at $27.11B. TAP’s [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] market capitalization is $9.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $129.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $23.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STZ is a better buy in the long-term than TAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAP is a better buy in the short-term than STZ.

Price Growth

STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +11.30% price change this week, while TAP (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was +9.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

STZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2026.

TAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+2.18% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STZ($27.1B) has a higher market cap than TAP($9.98B). STZ has higher P/E ratio than TAP: STZ (24.55) vs TAP (8.52). STZ YTD gains are higher at: 13.337 vs. TAP (8.162). STZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.55B vs. TAP (2.41B). TAP has less debt than STZ: TAP (6.29B) vs STZ (10.5B). TAP has higher revenues than STZ: TAP (11.2B) vs STZ (9.62B).
STZTAPSTZ / TAP
Capitalization27.1B9.98B272%
EBITDA2.55B2.41B106%
Gain YTD13.3378.162163%
P/E Ratio24.558.52288%
Revenue9.62B11.2B86%
Total Cash200MN/A-
Total Debt10.5B6.29B167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STZ vs TAP: Fundamental Ratings
STZ
TAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1020
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
5295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9474
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAP's Valuation (41) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (50). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (100). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's SMR Rating (52) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (95). This means that STZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (56). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (94). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STZTAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TETH16.910.90
+5.62%
21Shares Ethereum ETF
DLS83.210.40
+0.49%
WisdomTree International SmallCp Div ETF
IVVW45.860.08
+0.17%
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
WISE41.12-0.10
-0.25%
Themes Generative Artificial Int ETF
MSDD63.87-5.23
-7.56%
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF

STZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with DEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then DEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STZ
1D Price
Change %
STZ100%
+2.09%
DEO - STZ
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
TAP - STZ
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.62%
BUD - STZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
MGPI - STZ
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
SAM - STZ
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
More

TAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with STZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then STZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAP
1D Price
Change %
TAP100%
+2.62%
STZ - TAP
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
SAM - TAP
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
DEO - TAP
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
BUD - TAP
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
MGPI - TAP
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
More