STRM
Price
$3.47
Change
-$0.18 (-4.93%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
TCYSF
Price
$33.28
Change
+$1.48 (+4.65%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

STRM vs TCYSF

Header iconSTRM vs TCYSF Comparison
Open Charts STRM vs TCYSFBanner chart's image
Streamline Health Solutions
Price$3.47
Change-$0.18 (-4.93%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Tecsys
Price$33.28
Change+$1.48 (+4.65%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
STRM vs TCYSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
STRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STRM vs. TCYSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STRM is a Buy and TCYSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (STRM: $3.65 vs. TCYSF: $33.28)
Brand notoriety: STRM and TCYSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STRM: 323% vs. TCYSF: 4%
Market capitalization -- STRM: $28.36M vs. TCYSF: $299.57M
STRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $28.36M. TCYSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $299.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTCYSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • STRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TCYSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCYSF is a better buy in the long-term than STRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STRM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • STRM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

STRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.29% price change this week, while TCYSF (@Packaged Software) price change was +7.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

STRM is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCYSF($300M) has a higher market cap than STRM($28.4M). TCYSF YTD gains are higher at: 38.091 vs. STRM (-42.745). TCYSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.99M vs. STRM (-5.43M). TCYSF has more cash in the bank: 37.1M vs. STRM (4.09M). TCYSF has less debt than STRM: TCYSF (2.91M) vs STRM (9.52M). TCYSF has higher revenues than STRM: TCYSF (152M) vs STRM (24.1M).
STRMTCYSFSTRM / TCYSF
Capitalization28.4M300M9%
EBITDA-5.43M7.99M-68%
Gain YTD-42.74538.091-112%
P/E RatioN/A208.33-
Revenue24.1M152M16%
Total Cash4.09M37.1M11%
Total Debt9.52M2.91M327%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STRM vs TCYSF: Fundamental Ratings
STRM
TCYSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1392
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10046
SMR RATING
1..100
9786
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7851
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STRM's Valuation (83) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TCYSF (87) in the null industry. This means that STRM’s stock grew similarly to TCYSF’s over the last 12 months.

TCYSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STRM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TCYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STRM’s over the last 12 months.

TCYSF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as STRM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TCYSF’s stock grew similarly to STRM’s over the last 12 months.

TCYSF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as STRM (45) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TCYSF’s stock grew similarly to STRM’s over the last 12 months.

TCYSF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as STRM (78) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TCYSF’s stock grew similarly to STRM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
STRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

STRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STRM has been loosely correlated with RVRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STRM jumps, then RVRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STRM
1D Price
Change %
STRM100%
+7.67%
RVRC - STRM
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SPNUF - STRM
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SPMYY - STRM
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABANF - STRM
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VS - STRM
25%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
More

TCYSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCYSF and HKIT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCYSF and HKIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCYSF
1D Price
Change %
TCYSF100%
N/A
HKIT - TCYSF
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
STRM - TCYSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.67%
THQQF - TCYSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMICY - TCYSF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
UBSFF - TCYSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
More