STPGF
Price
$0.89
Change
-$0.04 (-4.30%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
61.14M
SVGAF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.06 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

STPGF vs SVGAF

Header iconSTPGF vs SVGAF Comparison
Open Charts STPGF vs SVGAFBanner chart's image
Steppe Gold
Price$0.89
Change-$0.04 (-4.30%)
Volume$14.75K
Capitalization61.14M
Silver Grail Resources
Price$0.06
Change-$0.06 (-50.00%)
Volume$31.3K
Capitalization3.66M
STPGF vs SVGAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STPGF vs. SVGAF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STPGF is a Hold and SVGAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (STPGF: $0.89 vs. SVGAF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: STPGF and SVGAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STPGF: 27% vs. SVGAF: 518%
Market capitalization -- STPGF: $61.14M vs. SVGAF: $3.66M
STPGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $61.14M. SVGAF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STPGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVGAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • STPGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVGAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STPGF is a better buy in the long-term than SVGAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STPGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVGAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STPGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SVGAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVGAF is a better buy in the short-term than STPGF.

Price Growth

STPGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.55% price change this week, while SVGAF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STPGF($61.1M) has a higher market cap than SVGAF($3.66M). STPGF YTD gains are higher at: 107.130 vs. SVGAF (100.000). STPGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30M vs. SVGAF (-39.87K). STPGF has more cash in the bank: 2.07M vs. SVGAF (237K). STPGF has higher revenues than SVGAF: STPGF (66.4M) vs SVGAF (0).
STPGFSVGAFSTPGF / SVGAF
Capitalization61.1M3.66M1,671%
EBITDA30M-39.87K-75,237%
Gain YTD107.130100.000107%
P/E Ratio1.90N/A-
Revenue66.4M0-
Total Cash2.07M237K873%
Total Debt12.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STPGF vs SVGAF: Fundamental Ratings
STPGF
SVGAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STPGF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVGAF (83). This means that STPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVGAF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SVGAF (100). This means that STPGF’s stock grew similarly to SVGAF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVGAF (94). This means that STPGF’s stock grew significantly faster than SVGAF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SVGAF (36). This means that STPGF’s stock grew similarly to SVGAF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as SVGAF (99). This means that STPGF’s stock grew similarly to SVGAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STPGFSVGAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSBHF19.970.43
+2.20%
Mitsubishi Corp.
NODB54.50N/A
N/A
North Dallas Bank & Trust Co. (TX)
BLHEF227.98N/A
N/A
Baloise Holdings AG
MTAGF2.70N/A
N/A
Ceconomy AG
CYMHF0.13N/A
-1.82%
Cymat Technologies Ltd.

STPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STPGF and GLGDF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STPGF and GLGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STPGF
1D Price
Change %
STPGF100%
-4.11%
GLGDF - STPGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.46%
SAPLF - STPGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
WHGOF - STPGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.00%
CNRIF - STPGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBMF - STPGF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SVGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVGAF has been loosely correlated with EREPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVGAF jumps, then EREPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVGAF
1D Price
Change %
SVGAF100%
-50.00%
EREPF - SVGAF
36%
Loosely correlated
-16.88%
NPTLF - SVGAF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZMPLF - SVGAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STPGF - SVGAF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
SSVFF - SVGAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
More