STLRF
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.04 (-4.88%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
102.57M
ZIJMF
Price
$3.42
Change
-$0.18 (-5.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
94.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

STLRF vs ZIJMF

Header iconSTLRF vs ZIJMF Comparison
Open Charts STLRF vs ZIJMFBanner chart's image
STLLR GOLD
Price$0.78
Change-$0.04 (-4.88%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization102.57M
Zijin Mining Group
Price$3.42
Change-$0.18 (-5.00%)
Volume$44.65K
Capitalization94.52B
STLRF vs ZIJMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZIJMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STLRF vs. ZIJMF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STLRF is a StrongBuy and ZIJMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (STLRF: $0.82 vs. ZIJMF: $3.67)
Brand notoriety: STLRF and ZIJMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STLRF: 272% vs. ZIJMF: 40%
Market capitalization -- STLRF: $102.57M vs. ZIJMF: $94.52B
STLRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $102.57M. ZIJMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $94.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STLRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZIJMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • STLRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZIJMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZIJMF is a better buy in the long-term than STLRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STLRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZIJMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STLRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZIJMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STLRF is a better buy in the short-term than ZIJMF.

Price Growth

STLRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.25% price change this week, while ZIJMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4862.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZIJMF($94.5B) has a higher market cap than STLRF($103M). ZIJMF YTD gains are higher at: 88.187 vs. STLRF (34.806). ZIJMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 58B vs. STLRF (-33.09M). ZIJMF has more cash in the bank: 46.3B vs. STLRF (15.9M). STLRF has less debt than ZIJMF: STLRF (1.2M) vs ZIJMF (154B). ZIJMF has higher revenues than STLRF: ZIJMF (308B) vs STLRF (0).
STLRFZIJMFSTLRF / ZIJMF
Capitalization103M94.5B0%
EBITDA-33.09M58B-0%
Gain YTD34.80688.18739%
P/E RatioN/A17.65-
Revenue0308B-
Total Cash15.9M46.3B0%
Total Debt1.2M154B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STLRF vs ZIJMF: Fundamental Ratings
STLRF
ZIJMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
288
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
9635
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10034
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4525

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZIJMF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (35). This means that ZIJMF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

ZIJMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STLRF (100). This means that ZIJMF’s stock grew significantly faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

ZIJMF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STLRF (96). This means that ZIJMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

ZIJMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (40). This means that ZIJMF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

ZIJMF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STLRF (100). This means that ZIJMF’s stock grew significantly faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STLRFZIJMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZIJMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWHL0.460.04
+8.75%
Aspira Women's Health Inc.
PNXGF8.80N/A
N/A
Phoenix Group Hldgs Plc
CADLF5.52N/A
N/A
CADELER AS
PTOAF0.50N/A
N/A
CAVVY ENERGY LTD.
LVMUY116.58-5.12
-4.21%
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with NSUPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then NSUPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
-5.28%
NSUPF - STLRF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
TORXF - STLRF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
CGLCF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-5.84%
SMAGF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
MAUTF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More

ZIJMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZIJMF and ZIJMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZIJMF and ZIJMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZIJMF
1D Price
Change %
ZIJMF100%
-4.86%
ZIJMY - ZIJMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
WHGOF - ZIJMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.18%
RMLRF - ZIJMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
AUGO - ZIJMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
STLRF - ZIJMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.28%
More