STJPF
Price
$16.10
Change
+$0.26 (+1.64%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
6.63B
URNAF
Price
$4.69
Change
-$0.01 (-0.21%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
127.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

STJPF vs URNAF

Header iconSTJPF vs URNAF Comparison
Open Charts STJPF vs URNAFBanner chart's image
St. James Place Capital
Price$16.10
Change+$0.26 (+1.64%)
Volume$150
Capitalization6.63B
Urbana
Price$4.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.21%)
Volume$1.28K
Capitalization127.58M
STJPF vs URNAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
URNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STJPF vs. URNAF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STJPF is a Buy and URNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (STJPF: $16.10 vs. URNAF: $4.69)
Brand notoriety: STJPF and URNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STJPF: 33% vs. URNAF: 70%
Market capitalization -- STJPF: $6.63B vs. URNAF: $127.58M
STJPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $6.63B. URNAF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $127.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STJPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileURNAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • STJPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • URNAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, URNAF is a better buy in the long-term than STJPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STJPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while URNAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STJPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • URNAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STJPF is a better buy in the short-term than URNAF.

Price Growth

STJPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.67% price change this week, while URNAF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.40% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STJPF($6.63B) has a higher market cap than URNAF($128M). STJPF has higher P/E ratio than URNAF: STJPF (16.00) vs URNAF (8.86). STJPF YTD gains are higher at: 83.163 vs. URNAF (19.640). STJPF has more cash in the bank: 6.68B vs. URNAF (2.05M). URNAF has less debt than STJPF: URNAF (36.1M) vs STJPF (316M). STJPF has higher revenues than URNAF: STJPF (12.4B) vs URNAF (-6.33M).
STJPFURNAFSTJPF / URNAF
Capitalization6.63B128M5,177%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD83.16319.640423%
P/E Ratio16.008.86181%
Revenue12.4B-6.33M-195,739%
Total Cash6.68B2.05M326,846%
Total Debt316M36.1M875%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STJPF vs URNAF: Fundamental Ratings
STJPF
URNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
783
SMR RATING
1..100
2461
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
509
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

URNAF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as STJPF (49). This means that URNAF’s stock grew similarly to STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

URNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STJPF (78). This means that URNAF’s stock grew significantly faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for URNAF (61). This means that STJPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than URNAF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as URNAF (49). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to URNAF’s over the last 12 months.

URNAF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STJPF (50). This means that URNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STJPFURNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
URNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HISCX28.170.32
+1.15%
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS IA
GTMUX23.780.22
+0.93%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth R6
BGRUX93.380.62
+0.67%
Baron Growth R6
CBLLX11.100.06
+0.54%
Allspring Large Cap Value Admin
RYPAX51.080.14
+0.27%
Rydex Transportation H

STJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STJPF and SLFPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STJPF and SLFPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STJPF
1D Price
Change %
STJPF100%
N/A
SLFPF - STJPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TETAA - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGOPY - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
VSQTF - STJPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+7.93%
URNAF - STJPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

URNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that URNAF and WNDLF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URNAF and WNDLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To URNAF
1D Price
Change %
URNAF100%
N/A
WNDLF - URNAF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UBAAF - URNAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOLCF - URNAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
SLFPY - URNAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
SVCTF - URNAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More