STJPF
Price
$18.00
Change
+$1.36 (+8.17%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
8.55B
TETAA
Price
$14.50
Change
-$1.50 (-9.38%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

STJPF vs TETAA

Header iconSTJPF vs TETAA Comparison
Open Charts STJPF vs TETAABanner chart's image
St. James Place Capital
Price$18.00
Change+$1.36 (+8.17%)
Volume$4.7K
Capitalization8.55B
Teton Advisors
Price$14.50
Change-$1.50 (-9.38%)
Volume$196
Capitalization27.6M
STJPF vs TETAA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TETAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STJPF vs. TETAA commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STJPF is a StrongBuy and TETAA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (STJPF: $18.00 vs. TETAA: $14.50)
Brand notoriety: STJPF and TETAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STJPF: 352% vs. TETAA: 8%
Market capitalization -- STJPF: $8.55B vs. TETAA: $27.6M
STJPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $8.55B. TETAA’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $27.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STJPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTETAA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • STJPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TETAA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STJPF is a better buy in the long-term than TETAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STJPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TETAA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STJPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TETAA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TETAA is a better buy in the short-term than STJPF.

Price Growth

STJPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TETAA (@Investment Managers) price change was -9.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STJPF($8.55B) has a higher market cap than TETAA($27.6M). TETAA has higher P/E ratio than STJPF: TETAA (19.08) vs STJPF (14.20). STJPF YTD gains are higher at: 104.778 vs. TETAA (7.567). STJPF has more cash in the bank: 6.4B vs. TETAA (25.2M). TETAA has less debt than STJPF: TETAA (110K) vs STJPF (402M). STJPF has higher revenues than TETAA: STJPF (16.9B) vs TETAA (10.2M).
STJPFTETAASTJPF / TETAA
Capitalization8.55B27.6M30,967%
EBITDAN/A759K-
Gain YTD104.7787.5671,385%
P/E Ratio14.2019.0874%
Revenue16.9B10.2M165,686%
Total Cash6.4B25.2M25,413%
Total Debt402M110K365,455%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STJPF vs TETAA: Fundamental Ratings
STJPF
TETAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
2187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6063
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
247

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STJPF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as TETAA (99). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as TETAA (100). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TETAA (87). This means that STJPF’s stock grew significantly faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as TETAA (55). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as TETAA (63). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STJPFTETAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TETAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVVNF3.550.04
+1.14%
Vivendi SE
CTARF1.90N/A
N/A
Centaurus Energy Inc.
ALPIB29.20N/A
N/A
Alpine Banks of Colorado
NKGFF0.10N/A
-0.10%
Nevada King Gold Corp.
JMHLY60.10-0.64
-1.05%
Jardine Matheson Holdings Ltd.

STJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STJPF and SLFPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STJPF and SLFPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STJPF
1D Price
Change %
STJPF100%
N/A
SLFPF - STJPF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
TETAA - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGOPY - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
VSQTF - STJPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
URNAF - STJPF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
More

TETAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TETAA has been loosely correlated with AMDUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TETAA jumps, then AMDUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TETAA
1D Price
Change %
TETAA100%
N/A
AMDUF - TETAA
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CG - TETAA
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
AIMFF - TETAA
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
STJPF - TETAA
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSQTF - TETAA
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
More