Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
STEW vs XLF
STEW vs XLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
STEW vs. XLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STEW is a Buy and XLF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLF has more net assets: 53.2B vs. STEW (2.16B). STEW has a higher annual dividend yield than XLF: STEW (14.149) vs XLF (11.355). STEW was incepted earlier than XLF: STEW (53 years) vs XLF (27 years). XLF (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than STEW (2.28). STEW has a higher turnover XLF (3.00) vs XLF (3.00).
| STEW | XLF | STEW / XLF | |
| Gain YTD | 14.149 | 11.355 | 125% |
| Net Assets | 2.16B | 53.2B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 0.08 | 2,850% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 3.00 | 233% |
| Yield | 0.22 | 1.38 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| STEW | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 73% | 20 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
STEW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STEW has been closely correlated with JPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STEW jumps, then JPM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STEW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEW | 100% | N/A | ||
| JPM - STEW | 75% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| CSCO - STEW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| SWK - STEW | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
| EPD - STEW | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| MSFT - STEW | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||
XLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLF has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLF jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLF | 100% | +0.70% | ||
| HBAN - XLF | 86% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| TFC - XLF | 84% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CFG - XLF | 83% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| SYF - XLF | 82% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| CPAY - XLF | 81% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||