STBMF
Price
$0.29
Change
+$0.01 (+3.57%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
371.28M
STPGF
Price
$1.31
Change
-$0.03 (-2.24%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
335.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

STBMF vs STPGF

Header iconSTBMF vs STPGF Comparison
Open Charts STBMF vs STPGFBanner chart's image
St. Barbara
Price$0.29
Change+$0.01 (+3.57%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization371.28M
Steppe Gold
Price$1.31
Change-$0.03 (-2.24%)
Volume$19.03K
Capitalization335.65M
STBMF vs STPGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STBMF vs. STPGF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STBMF is a Buy and STPGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (STBMF: $0.29 vs. STPGF: $1.31)
Brand notoriety: STBMF and STPGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STBMF: 305% vs. STPGF: 30%
Market capitalization -- STBMF: $371.28M vs. STPGF: $335.65M
STBMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $371.28M. STPGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $335.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STBMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTPGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • STBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STPGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, STPGF is a better buy in the long-term than STBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STBMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STPGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STBMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STPGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STPGF is a better buy in the short-term than STBMF.

Price Growth

STBMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STPGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.35% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($371M) has a higher market cap than STPGF($336M). STPGF YTD gains are higher at: 205.191 vs. STBMF (176.724).
STBMFSTPGFSTBMF / STPGF
Capitalization371M336M110%
EBITDAN/A81.2M-
Gain YTD176.724205.19186%
P/E RatioN/A10.27-
RevenueN/A148M-
Total CashN/A107M-
Total DebtN/A156M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STBMF vs STPGF: Fundamental Ratings
STBMF
STPGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4480
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9519
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9610
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STBMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STPGF (60). This means that STBMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STPGF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as STPGF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to STPGF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STBMF (95). This means that STPGF’s stock grew significantly faster than STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (36). This means that STPGF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STBMF (96). This means that STPGF’s stock grew significantly faster than STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STBMFSTPGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CESGX11.770.05
+0.43%
Coho Relative Value ESG
MXETX13.48N/A
N/A
Empower Core Strategies US Eq Inv
PMILX11.23N/A
N/A
Putnam Multi-Asset Income R5
PASSX58.78-0.11
-0.19%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Adv
HCMDX31.10-0.39
-1.24%
HCM Tactical Plus Investor

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STBMF and KSSRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STBMF and KSSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
N/A
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.83%
PREIF - STBMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.74%
STPGF - STBMF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
STRRF - STBMF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
More

STPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STPGF and WHGOF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STPGF and WHGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STPGF
1D Price
Change %
STPGF100%
-1.78%
WHGOF - STPGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.71%
STBMF - STPGF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDRRF - STPGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
STRRF - STPGF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%