Advertisement
SSMXF vs SUVPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSMXF is a Hold and SUVPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SSMXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSUVPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SSMXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SUVPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SSMXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUVPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SSMXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SUVPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
SSMXF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUVPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -3.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.07%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.70%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+0.25% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.99% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| SSMXF | SUVPF | SSMXF / SUVPF | |
| Capitalization | 8.3B | 14.2B | 58% |
| EBITDA | 120B | 844M | 14,218% |
| Gain YTD | -35.300 | 0.639 | -5,526% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.41 | 125.90 | 17% |
| Revenue | 491B | 3.47B | 14,158% |
| Total Cash | 93B | 872M | 10,665% |
| Total Debt | 55.7B | 4.66B | 1,197% |
SSMXF | SUVPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 17 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SSMXF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SUVPF (81). This means that SSMXF’s stock grew similarly to SUVPF’s over the last 12 months.
SSMXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SUVPF (100). This means that SSMXF’s stock grew similarly to SUVPF’s over the last 12 months.
SUVPF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SSMXF (100). This means that SUVPF’s stock grew similarly to SSMXF’s over the last 12 months.
SUVPF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SSMXF (88). This means that SUVPF’s stock grew similarly to SSMXF’s over the last 12 months.
SSMXF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SUVPF (90). This means that SSMXF’s stock grew similarly to SUVPF’s over the last 12 months.
| SSMXF | SUVPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 33% | 4 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 32% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVMU | 44.83 | 0.37 | +0.84% |
| Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Inc ETF | |||
| FFDI | 29.51 | 0.08 | +0.29% |
| Fidelity Fundamental Developed Intl ETF | |||
| AVK | 12.48 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| Advent Convertible and Income Fund | |||
| VIS | 290.16 | -0.52 | -0.18% |
| Vanguard Industrials ETF | |||
| LFEQ | 51.58 | -0.17 | -0.33% |
| VanEck Lg/Flat Trend ETF | |||
SSMXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSMXF has been loosely correlated with NHNKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSMXF jumps, then NHNKF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SSMXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSMXF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NHNKF - SSMXF | 45% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SSMXY - SSMXF | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
| SMMNY - SSMXF | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| SUVPF - SSMXF | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.43% | ||
| TCHBF - SSMXF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SUVPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SUVPF and TLSI have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUVPF and TLSI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUVPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUVPF | 100% | -2.43% | ||
| TLSI - SUVPF | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.11% | ||
| ALGN - SUVPF | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.28% | ||
| GKOS - SUVPF | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.22% | ||
| SOAGY - SUVPF | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.02% | ||
| UEEC - SUVPF | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.61% | ||
More | ||||