SSLZY
Price
$5.18
Change
+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.52B
38 days until earnings call
TAOIF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
19.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SSLZY vs TAOIF

Header iconSSLZY vs TAOIF Comparison
Open Charts SSLZY vs TAOIFBanner chart's image
Santos
Price$5.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Volume$49.24K
Capitalization16.52B
TAG Oil
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.52K
Capitalization19.67M
SSLZY vs TAOIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SSLZY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SSLZY vs. TAOIF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSLZY is a Hold and TAOIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SSLZY: $5.18 vs. TAOIF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: SSLZY and TAOIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SSLZY: 152% vs. TAOIF: 5%
Market capitalization -- SSLZY: $16.52B vs. TAOIF: $19.67M
SSLZY [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $16.52B. TAOIF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $19.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SSLZY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAOIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SSLZY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAOIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSLZY is a better buy in the long-term than TAOIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SSLZY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAOIF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SSLZY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TAOIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SSLZY and TAOIF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SSLZY (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -2.08% price change this week, while TAOIF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -17.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

SSLZY is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSLZY($16.5B) has a higher market cap than TAOIF($19.7M). SSLZY YTD gains are higher at: 27.115 vs. TAOIF (-8.103). SSLZY has more cash in the bank: 1.83B vs. TAOIF (3.15M). TAOIF has less debt than SSLZY: TAOIF (1.38M) vs SSLZY (6.69B).
SSLZYTAOIFSSLZY / TAOIF
Capitalization16.5B19.7M83,756%
EBITDAN/A-8.6M-
Gain YTD27.115-8.103-335%
P/E Ratio16.39N/A-
RevenueN/A1.19M-
Total Cash1.83B3.15M58,154%
Total Debt6.69B1.38M485,341%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SSLZY vs TAOIF: Fundamental Ratings
SSLZY
TAOIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4598
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2298
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAOIF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SSLZY (63). This means that TAOIF’s stock grew similarly to SSLZY’s over the last 12 months.

SSLZY's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAOIF (98). This means that SSLZY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAOIF’s over the last 12 months.

SSLZY's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as TAOIF (95). This means that SSLZY’s stock grew similarly to TAOIF’s over the last 12 months.

SSLZY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as TAOIF (46). This means that SSLZY’s stock grew similarly to TAOIF’s over the last 12 months.

SSLZY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAOIF (98). This means that SSLZY’s stock grew significantly faster than TAOIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSLZYTAOIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SSLZY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LTSRF0.12N/A
+1.63%
Lotus Resources Ltd
YUEIY8.290.08
+0.97%
Yue Yuen Industrial (Holdings) Ltd
JFWV110.00N/A
N/A
JSB Financial Inc.
NDATF0.01N/A
N/A
NDATALYZE CORP.
RCDTF65.44N/A
N/A
Recordati Industria Chimica e Farmaceutica S.p.A.

SSLZY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSLZY has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSLZY jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSLZY
1D Price
Change %
SSLZY100%
+0.19%
WDS - SSLZY
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
MGY - SSLZY
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.98%
OXY - SSLZY
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
MUR - SSLZY
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.96%
DVN - SSLZY
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
More

TAOIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAOIF and ROKRF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAOIF and ROKRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAOIF
1D Price
Change %
TAOIF100%
-0.44%
ROKRF - TAOIF
33%
Poorly correlated
-5.25%
GPRK - TAOIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
VET - TAOIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
SSLZY - TAOIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
HMENF - TAOIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More