Advertisement
SSLLF vs SUMCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSLLF is a Hold and SUMCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SSLLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSUMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SSLLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SUMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SSLLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SSLLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
- SUMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
SSLLF (@Semiconductors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUMCF (@Semiconductors) price change was +8.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.44%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+5.05% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| SSLLF | SUMCF | SSLLF / SUMCF | |
| Capitalization | 1.45B | 5.15B | 28% |
| EBITDA | 365M | 136B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -16.150 | 2.873 | -562% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.29 | 7.59 | 347% |
| Revenue | 1.42B | 451B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 595M | 214B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.52B | 141B | 1% |
SSLLF | SUMCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 6 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SUMCF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as SSLLF (48). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew similarly to SSLLF’s over the last 12 months.
SUMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SSLLF (100). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew similarly to SSLLF’s over the last 12 months.
SUMCF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSLLF (88). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSLLF’s over the last 12 months.
SUMCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSLLF (83). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSLLF’s over the last 12 months.
SSLLF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUMCF (70). This means that SSLLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUMCF’s over the last 12 months.
| SSLLF | SUMCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 45% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LGMCX | 24.26 | 0.15 | +0.62% |
| Loomis Sayles Global Allocation C | |||
| BPLSX | 13.75 | 0.06 | +0.44% |
| Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl | |||
| GGLIX | 13.71 | 0.04 | +0.29% |
| abrdn US Sustainable Leaders Instl | |||
| FRDPX | 93.46 | 0.24 | +0.26% |
| Franklin Rising Dividends A | |||
| CFSMX | 13.16 | 0.03 | +0.23% |
| Clarkston Partners Founders | |||
SSLLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SSLLF and STMEF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSLLF and STMEF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SSLLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSLLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| STMEF - SSLLF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TOELF - SSLLF | 11% Poorly correlated | +7.66% | ||
| SODI - SSLLF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ALGM - SSLLF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
| SUMCF - SSLLF | 7% Poorly correlated | +6.26% | ||
More | ||||
SUMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUMCF has been loosely correlated with SUOPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SUMCF jumps, then SUOPY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUMCF | 100% | +6.26% | ||
| SUOPY - SUMCF | 47% Loosely correlated | +12.48% | ||
| INTT - SUMCF | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.65% | ||
| STMEF - SUMCF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASMLF - SUMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| DQ - SUMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.56% | ||
More | ||||