SSILF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.04 (+50.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
565.14M
ZHSHF
Price
$1.35
Change
-$1.21 (-47.27%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
8.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SSILF vs ZHSHF

Header iconSSILF vs ZHSHF Comparison
Open Charts SSILF vs ZHSHFBanner chart's image
Sa Sa International Holdings
Price$0.12
Change+$0.04 (+50.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization565.14M
Zhongsheng Group Holdings
Price$1.35
Change-$1.21 (-47.27%)
Volume$14.5K
Capitalization8.36B
SSILF vs ZHSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SSILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZHSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SSILF vs. ZHSHF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSILF is a Hold and ZHSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (SSILF: $0.12 vs. ZHSHF: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: SSILF and ZHSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SSILF: 86% vs. ZHSHF: 299%
Market capitalization -- SSILF: $565.14M vs. ZHSHF: $8.36B
SSILF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $565.14M. ZHSHF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $8.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SSILF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZHSHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SSILF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZHSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSILF is a better buy in the long-term than ZHSHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SSILF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZHSHF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SSILF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZHSHF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSILF is a better buy in the short-term than ZHSHF.

Price Growth

SSILF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZHSHF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZHSHF($8.36B) has a higher market cap than SSILF($565M). SSILF has higher P/E ratio than ZHSHF: SSILF (97.09) vs ZHSHF (9.32). SSILF YTD gains are higher at: 27.837 vs. ZHSHF (-47.162). ZHSHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. SSILF (4.74M). ZHSHF has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. SSILF (303M). SSILF has less debt than ZHSHF: SSILF (596M) vs ZHSHF (28.7B). ZHSHF has higher revenues than SSILF: ZHSHF (175B) vs SSILF (3.5B).
SSILFZHSHFSSILF / ZHSHF
Capitalization565M8.36B7%
EBITDA4.74M15B0%
Gain YTD27.837-47.162-59%
P/E Ratio97.099.321,042%
Revenue3.5B175B2%
Total Cash303M11.3B3%
Total Debt596M28.7B2%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSILFZHSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SSILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZHSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WTID14.670.20
+1.35%
MicroSectors™ Energy -3X Invrs Lvrgd ETN
PYZ92.800.98
+1.07%
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF
DBA26.330.19
+0.73%
Invesco DB Agriculture
SCHB23.710.12
+0.51%
Schwab US Broad Market ETF™
SDOW42.23-1.14
-2.63%
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

SSILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSILF and WINH have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSILF and WINH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSILF
1D Price
Change %
SSILF100%
N/A
WINH - SSILF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GHST - SSILF
7%
Poorly correlated
+85.29%
ARHS - SSILF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
TKLF - SSILF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZHSHF - SSILF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZHSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZHSHF has been loosely correlated with IHCPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZHSHF jumps, then IHCPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZHSHF
1D Price
Change %
ZHSHF100%
N/A
IHCPF - ZHSHF
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JBHIF - ZHSHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLAB - ZHSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
-33.76%
GHST - ZHSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
+85.29%
SSILF - ZHSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More