Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WSMVX
SSGSX vs WSMVX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WSMVX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
Wilshire Small Company Value Instl
Price$27.49
Change-$0.50 (-1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.74M
SSGSX vs WSMVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WSMVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and WSMVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. WSMVX (21.7M). WSMVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WSMVX (1.44) vs SSGSX (0.49). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WSMVX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WSMVX (29 years). WSMVX (1.70) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). WSMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSMVX: SSGSX (2500) vs WSMVX (250000). WSMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.62 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). WSMVX return over 5 years is better than : 42.53 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| SSGSX | WSMVX | SSGSX / WSMVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.10 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.70 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.129 | 7.200 | -2% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.23B | 21.7M | 24,088% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.44 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.62 | -6.62 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.25 | 4.84 | -129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.71 | 42.53 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.45 | 32.34 | 63% |