Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVRX
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVRX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
William Blair Small Cap Value R6
Price$30.29
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets935.6M
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVRX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and WBVRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. WBVRX (936M). WBVRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVRX (0.97) vs SSGSX (0.48). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVRX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVRX (4 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than WBVRX (0.79). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WBVRX (35.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBVRX: SSGSX (2500) vs WBVRX (1000000). WBVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.82 vs. SSGSX (-2.42). WBVRX return over 5 years is better than : 123.87 vs. SSGSX (-0.63).
| SSGSX | WBVRX | SSGSX / WBVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.79 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.79 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.723 | 2.331 | -74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 936M | 548% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.97 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.42 | 1.82 | -133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.45 | 11.48 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.63 | 123.87 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers