Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVRX
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVRX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
William Blair Small Cap Value R6
Price$28.75
Change-$0.24 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVRX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and WBVRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. WBVRX (1.08B). WBVRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVRX (1.04) vs SSGSX (0.50). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVRX: SSGSX (26 years) vs WBVRX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVRX (0.79). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVRX (35.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBVRX: SSGSX (2500) vs WBVRX (1000000). WBVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.96 vs. SSGSX (-5.53). WBVRX return over 5 years is better than : 148.06 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| SSGSX | WBVRX | SSGSX / WBVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.025 | -2.872 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.5B | 1.08B | 508% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.04 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.53 | -3.96 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.76 | -9.59 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.88 | 148.06 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers