Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVRX
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVRX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.58
Change-$0.12 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.16B
William Blair Small Cap Value R6
Price$30.18
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets926.82M
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVRX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a StrongBuy and WBVRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.16B vs. WBVRX (927M). WBVRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVRX (0.97) vs SSGSX (0.48). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVRX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVRX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVRX (0.79). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVRX (35.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBVRX: SSGSX (2500) vs WBVRX (1000000). WBVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.56 vs. SSGSX (-13.68). WBVRX return over 5 years is better than : 134.50 vs. SSGSX (4.92).
| SSGSX | WBVRX | SSGSX / WBVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.582 | 2.196 | 26% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.16B | 927M | 556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.97 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.68 | -8.56 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.65 | -2.88 | 266% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.92 | 134.50 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.51 | N/A | - |