Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVRX
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVRX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
William Blair Small Cap Value R6
Price$29.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVRX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and WBVRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. WBVRX (1.11B). WBVRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVRX (0.98) vs SSGSX (0.47). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVRX: SSGSX (26 years) vs WBVRX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVRX (0.79). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVRX (35.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBVRX: SSGSX (2500) vs WBVRX (1000000). WBVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.22 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). WBVRX return over 5 years is better than : 164.81 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| SSGSX | WBVRX | SSGSX / WBVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.046 | 1.453 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.64B | 1.11B | 508% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.98 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.56 | 0.22 | -707% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.97 | 6.07 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.95 | 164.81 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement