Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVRX
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVRX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.22B
William Blair Small Cap Value R6
Price$29.54
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets910.64M
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and WBVRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. WBVRX (911M). WBVRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVRX (1.00) vs SSGSX (0.49). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVRX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVRX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVRX (0.79). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVRX (35.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBVRX: SSGSX (2500) vs WBVRX (1000000). WBVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.02 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). WBVRX return over 5 years is better than : 135.00 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| SSGSX | WBVRX | SSGSX / WBVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.129 | -0.203 | 64% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.22B | 911M | 573% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.00 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.62 | -9.02 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.25 | -4.11 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.71 | 135.00 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement