Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVNX
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVNX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.58
Change-$0.12 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.16B
William Blair Small Cap Value N
Price$30.15
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets926.82M
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a StrongBuy and WBVNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.16B vs. WBVNX (927M). WBVNX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVNX (0.58) vs SSGSX (0.48). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVNX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVNX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVNX (1.15). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVNX (35.00). SSGSX (2500) and WBVNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WBVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.88 vs. SSGSX (-13.68). WBVNX return over 5 years is better than : 144.10 vs. SSGSX (4.92).
| SSGSX | WBVNX | SSGSX / WBVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.582 | 1.854 | 31% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.16B | 927M | 556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.58 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.68 | -8.88 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.65 | -3.83 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.92 | 144.10 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.51 | 73.48 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement