Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVNX
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVNX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
William Blair Small Cap Value N
Price$28.74
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets990.53M
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and WBVNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. WBVNX (991M). WBVNX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVNX (0.59) vs SSGSX (0.48). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVNX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVNX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVNX (1.15). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVNX (35.00). SSGSX (2500) and WBVNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX (-8.48) and WBVNX (-8.66) have marching annual gain over last year. WBVNX return over 5 years is better than : 158.92 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| SSGSX | WBVNX | SSGSX / WBVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.034 | -3.134 | 33% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.31B | 991M | 535% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.59 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.48 | -8.66 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.10 | 1.05 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.06 | 158.92 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.76 | 65.74 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement