Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVNX
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVNX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.60
Change+$0.44 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.29B
William Blair Small Cap Value N
Price$31.44
Change+$0.26 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets953.04M
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVNX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a StrongBuy and WBVNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. WBVNX (953M). WBVNX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVNX (0.58) vs SSGSX (0.48). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVNX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVNX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVNX (1.15). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVNX (35.00). SSGSX (2500) and WBVNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WBVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.43 vs. SSGSX (-8.83). WBVNX return over 5 years is better than : 146.39 vs. SSGSX (6.40).
| SSGSX | WBVNX | SSGSX / WBVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.674 | 5.966 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.29B | 953M | 555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.58 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.83 | -3.43 | 257% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.03 | 4.54 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.40 | 146.39 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.48 | 90.66 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers