Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVNX
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVNX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
William Blair Small Cap Value N
Price$30.01
Change+$0.44 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVNX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and WBVNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. WBVNX (1.11B). WBVNX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVNX (0.58) vs SSGSX (0.47). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVNX: SSGSX (26 years) vs WBVNX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVNX (1.15). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVNX (35.00). SSGSX (2500) and WBVNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WBVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.11 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). WBVNX return over 5 years is better than : 175.76 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| SSGSX | WBVNX | SSGSX / WBVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.046 | 1.213 | 169% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.64B | 1.11B | 507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.58 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.56 | -0.11 | 1,438% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.97 | 5.04 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.95 | 175.76 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.71 | 78.54 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement