Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVNX
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVNX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.22B
William Blair Small Cap Value N
Price$29.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets910.64M
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and WBVNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. WBVNX (911M). WBVNX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVNX (0.60) vs SSGSX (0.49). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVNX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVNX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVNX (1.15). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVNX (35.00). SSGSX (2500) and WBVNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WBVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.36 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). WBVNX return over 5 years is better than : 144.69 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| SSGSX | WBVNX | SSGSX / WBVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.129 | -0.539 | 24% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.22B | 911M | 573% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.60 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.62 | -9.36 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.25 | -5.08 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.71 | 144.69 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.45 | 72.98 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement