Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs VSFCX
SSGSX vs VSFCX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs VSFCX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value C
Price$22.36
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.64M
SSGSX vs VSFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. VSFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and VSFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. VSFCX (162M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than VSFCX: SSGSX (0.47) vs VSFCX (0.31). SSGSX was incepted earlier than VSFCX: SSGSX (26 years) vs VSFCX (30 years). VSFCX (2.23) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). VSFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). VSFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: VSFCX (1500) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. VSFCX (-3.06). VSFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.69 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| SSGSX | VSFCX | SSGSX / VSFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.96 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 2.23 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.046 | 4.809 | 43% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1500 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.64B | 162M | 3,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.31 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.56 | -3.06 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.97 | 4.28 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.95 | 36.69 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.71 | -1.95 | -1,266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement