Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs USBNX
SSGSX vs USBNX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs USBNX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Ord
Price$27.64
Change-$0.37 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.92M
SSGSX vs USBNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. USBNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and USBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. USBNX (95.9M). USBNX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: USBNX (0.72) vs SSGSX (0.58). SSGSX was incepted earlier than USBNX: SSGSX (27 years) vs USBNX (34 years). USBNX (1.42) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX (50.00) and USBNX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. SSGSX (2500) and USBNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. USBNX (0.63). USBNX return over 5 years is better than : 14.13 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| SSGSX | USBNX | SSGSX / USBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.42 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.42 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.123 | 7.507 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.04B | 95.9M | 5,259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.72 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 0.63 | 605% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.10 | 12.38 | -25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.23 | 14.13 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.01 | 51.29 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement