Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs UBVRX
SSGSX vs UBVRX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs UBVRX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R2
Price$81.02
Change+$0.46 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.95B
SSGSX vs UBVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. UBVRX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and UBVRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBVRX has more cash in the bank: 9.95B vs. SSGSX (5.82B). UBVRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: UBVRX (1.35) vs SSGSX (0.51). SSGSX was incepted earlier than UBVRX: SSGSX (26 years) vs UBVRX (12 years). UBVRX (1.62) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. UBVRX (27.00). UBVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: UBVRX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). UBVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. SSGSX (-1.26). UBVRX return over 5 years is better than : 99.37 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| SSGSX | UBVRX | SSGSX / UBVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.55 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.62 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.068 | 1.326 | -156% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.82B | 9.95B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.35 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.26 | 7.29 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.38 | 11.48 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.33 | 99.37 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.52 | 49.14 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement