Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs UBVCX
SSGSX vs UBVCX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs UBVCX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val C
Price$69.41
Change+$0.29 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.96B
SSGSX vs UBVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. UBVCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and UBVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBVCX has more cash in the bank: 8.96B vs. SSGSX (5.13B). UBVCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: UBVCX (1.21) vs SSGSX (0.48). SSGSX was incepted earlier than UBVCX: SSGSX (27 years) vs UBVCX (22 years). UBVCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. UBVCX (35.00). UBVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: UBVCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. UBVCX (-7.31). UBVCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.76 vs. SSGSX (-0.63).
| SSGSX | UBVCX | SSGSX / UBVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.74 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.84 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.723 | -7.144 | 24% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 8.96B | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.21 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.42 | -7.31 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.45 | 4.06 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.63 | 21.76 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.71 | 37.55 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers