Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TSVQX
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TSVQX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R6
Price$18.56
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets389.05M
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TSVQX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and TSVQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. TSVQX (389M). TSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TSVQX (1.50) vs SSGSX (0.47). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TSVQX: SSGSX (26 years) vs TSVQX (11 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TSVQX (0.69). TSVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). TSVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TSVQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). TSVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). TSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| SSGSX | TSVQX | SSGSX / TSVQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.68 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.69 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.046 | 9.628 | 21% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.64B | 389M | 1,451% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.50 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.56 | 0.02 | -7,245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.97 | 0.80 | 498% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.95 | 61.83 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.71 | -5.73 | -431% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement