Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TSVQX
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TSVQX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R6
Price$20.57
Change+$2.40 (+13.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets404.04M
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TSVQX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and TSVQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. TSVQX (404M). TSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TSVQX (0.97) vs SSGSX (0.58). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TSVQX: SSGSX (27 years) vs TSVQX (11 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than TSVQX (0.69). TSVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). TSVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TSVQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). TSVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.42 vs. SSGSX (3.83). TSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 26.54 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| SSGSX | TSVQX | SSGSX / TSVQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.68 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.69 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.123 | 8.206 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.04B | 404M | 1,248% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.97 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 22.42 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.10 | 17.85 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.23 | 26.54 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.01 | 68.65 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement