Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TSVQX
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TSVQX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R6
Price$18.39
Change-$0.25 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets375.86M
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TSVQX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and TSVQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. TSVQX (376M). TSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TSVQX (1.51) vs SSGSX (0.49). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TSVQX: SSGSX (27 years) vs TSVQX (11 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TSVQX (0.69). TSVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). TSVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TSVQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). TSVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.46 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). TSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 42.45 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| SSGSX | TSVQX | SSGSX / TSVQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.68 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.69 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.129 | 10.100 | -1% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.23B | 376M | 1,390% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.51 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.62 | -7.46 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.25 | -5.57 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.71 | 42.45 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.45 | -8.51 | -240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers