Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TSVQX
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TSVQX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.53
Change-$0.78 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R6
Price$15.78
Change-$0.31 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.13M
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TSVQX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and TSVQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. TSVQX (335M). TSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TSVQX (1.72) vs SSGSX (0.52). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TSVQX: SSGSX (26 years) vs TSVQX (11 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TSVQX (0.69). TSVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). TSVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TSVQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.36 vs. TSVQX (-9.12). TSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 50.40 vs. SSGSX (21.72).
| SSGSX | TSVQX | SSGSX / TSVQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.68 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.69 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.400 | -6.793 | 124% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.52B | 335M | 1,649% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.72 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.36 | -9.12 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.90 | -13.64 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.72 | 50.40 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.10 | -28.06 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers