Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TSVQX
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TSVQX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.05
Change+$0.29 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R6
Price$19.94
Change+$0.10 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets395.23M
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TSVQX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and TSVQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. TSVQX (395M). TSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TSVQX (1.03) vs SSGSX (0.61). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TSVQX: SSGSX (27 years) vs TSVQX (11 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than TSVQX (0.69). TSVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). TSVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TSVQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). TSVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.59 vs. SSGSX (1.49). TSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 25.21 vs. SSGSX (-3.16).
| SSGSX | TSVQX | SSGSX / TSVQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.68 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.69 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.281 | 4.892 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.04B | 395M | 1,276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.03 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.49 | 19.59 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.36 | 21.59 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.16 | 25.21 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.55 | 64.05 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement