Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TCFSCV
SSGSX vs TCFSCV Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TCFSCV
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
Thrivent Core Small Cap Value
Price$9.55
Change-$0.12 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.24M
SSGSX vs TCFSCV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. TCFSCV (143M). TCFSCV pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TCFSCV (1.51) vs SSGSX (0.49). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TCFSCV: SSGSX (27 years) vs TCFSCV (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TCFSCV (0.05). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TCFSCV (32.00). TCFSCV has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TCFSCV (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.62 vs. TCFSCV (-22.02).
| SSGSX | TCFSCV | SSGSX / TCFSCV | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.05 | 2,520% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.05 | 2,520% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.129 | -9.711 | 1% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.23B | 143M | 3,655% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.51 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.62 | -22.02 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.25 | 5.23 | -120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.71 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers