Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSFCX vs VBMPX
SSFCX vs VBMPX Comparison
Open Charts SSFCX vs VBMPX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index A
Price$87.23
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.01B
Vanguard Total Bond Market Idx InstlPls
Price$9.74
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.63B
SSFCX vs VBMPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSFCX vs. VBMPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSFCX is a Hold and VBMPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VBMPX has more cash in the bank: 385B vs. SSFCX (3.01B). VBMPX pays higher dividends than SSFCX: VBMPX (3.91) vs SSFCX (3.61). SSFCX was incepted earlier than VBMPX: SSFCX (11 years) vs VBMPX (16 years). SSFCX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VBMPX (0.02). VBMPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. SSFCX (16.00). SSFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VBMPX: SSFCX (2000) vs VBMPX (100000000). SSFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. VBMPX (2.52). SSFCX return over 5 years is better than : -4.83 vs. VBMPX (-14.87).
| SSFCX | VBMPX | SSFCX / VBMPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.02 | 2,375% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.02 | 2,930% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.066 | -0.205 | -32% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.01B | 385B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 3.91 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 2.52 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.83 | -14.87 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.49 | -8.43 | -136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers