SRTSF
Price
$15.64
Change
-$0.11 (-0.70%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UNLRY
Price
$3.17
Change
-$0.02 (-0.63%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.9B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRTSF vs UNLRY

Header iconSRTSF vs UNLRY Comparison
Open Charts SRTSF vs UNLRYBanner chart's image
Sarantis SA
Price$15.64
Change-$0.11 (-0.70%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization1.01B
PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk
Price$3.17
Change-$0.02 (-0.63%)
Volume$912
Capitalization5.9B
SRTSF vs UNLRY Comparison Chart in %
SRTSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNLRY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRTSF vs. UNLRY commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRTSF is a Hold and UNLRY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SRTSF: $15.64 vs. UNLRY: $3.17)
Brand notoriety: SRTSF and UNLRY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRTSF: 274% vs. UNLRY: 69%
Market capitalization -- SRTSF: $1.01B vs. UNLRY: $5.9B
SRTSF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $1.01B. UNLRY’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $5.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $337.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $19.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRTSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNLRY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SRTSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNLRY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNLRY is a better buy in the long-term than SRTSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRTSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNLRY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRTSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UNLRY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRTSF is a better buy in the short-term than UNLRY.

Price Growth

SRTSF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -7.78% price change this week, while UNLRY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.71% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNLRY($5.9B) has a higher market cap than SRTSF($1.01B). UNLRY has higher P/E ratio than SRTSF: UNLRY (27.65) vs SRTSF (16.67). UNLRY YTD gains are higher at: 45.482 vs. SRTSF (40.332). UNLRY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.29T vs. SRTSF (82.2M). UNLRY has more cash in the bank: 880B vs. SRTSF (51M). SRTSF has less debt than UNLRY: SRTSF (83.7M) vs UNLRY (1.6T). UNLRY has higher revenues than SRTSF: UNLRY (35.34T) vs SRTSF (600M).
SRTSFUNLRYSRTSF / UNLRY
Capitalization1.01B5.9B17%
EBITDA82.2M5.29T0%
Gain YTD40.33245.48289%
P/E Ratio16.6727.6560%
Revenue600M35.34T0%
Total Cash51M880B0%
Total Debt83.7M1.6T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRTSF vs UNLRY: Fundamental Ratings
SRTSF
UNLRY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33100
SMR RATING
1..100
6312
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4215
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNLRY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SRTSF (48). This means that UNLRY’s stock grew similarly to SRTSF’s over the last 12 months.

SRTSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNLRY (100). This means that SRTSF’s stock grew significantly faster than UNLRY’s over the last 12 months.

UNLRY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRTSF (63). This means that UNLRY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRTSF’s over the last 12 months.

UNLRY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SRTSF (55). This means that UNLRY’s stock grew similarly to SRTSF’s over the last 12 months.

UNLRY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as SRTSF (42). This means that UNLRY’s stock grew similarly to SRTSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRTSFUNLRY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
26%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRTSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNLRY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICRNX10.080.04
+0.40%
VY® CBRE Global Real Estate A
JGRSX12.510.03
+0.24%
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield R6
NPFFX70.510.09
+0.13%
American Funds New Perspective F1
DFWVX17.28N/A
N/A
DFA World ex US Value Port I
OGMNX57.95-0.23
-0.40%
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R

SRTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRTSF and UNLRF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRTSF and UNLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRTSF
1D Price
Change %
SRTSF100%
N/A
UNLRF - SRTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KITAF - SRTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPHCF - SRTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKIN - SRTSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
YSG - SRTSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More

UNLRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNLRY and UNLRF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNLRY and UNLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNLRY
1D Price
Change %
UNLRY100%
N/A
UNLRF - UNLRY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KITAF - UNLRY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKIN - UNLRY
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
WPNTF - UNLRY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRTSF - UNLRY
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More