It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SRRPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWOLTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SRRPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOLTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
SRRPF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WOLTF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -4.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
SRRPF | WOLTF | SRRPF / WOLTF | |
Capitalization | 70.1M | 30.6B | 0% |
EBITDA | 58.3M | 2.04B | 3% |
Gain YTD | 118.750 | -23.924 | -496% |
P/E Ratio | 13.98 | 23.21 | 60% |
Revenue | 381M | 6.08B | 6% |
Total Cash | 3.71M | 942M | 0% |
Total Debt | 137M | 5.21B | 3% |
SRRPF | WOLTF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SRRPF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WOLTF (85). This means that SRRPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WOLTF’s over the last 12 months.
WOLTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SRRPF (73). This means that WOLTF’s stock grew similarly to SRRPF’s over the last 12 months.
WOLTF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRRPF (76). This means that WOLTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRRPF’s over the last 12 months.
SRRPF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WOLTF (89). This means that SRRPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WOLTF’s over the last 12 months.
SRRPF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WOLTF (88). This means that SRRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than WOLTF’s over the last 12 months.
SRRPF | WOLTF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago13% | 3 days ago53% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago38% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago33% | 3 days ago39% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago50% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago17% | 3 days ago28% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago16% | 3 days ago23% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 28 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago48% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago62% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | 3 days ago24% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRRPF has been loosely correlated with GLAI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRRPF jumps, then GLAI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SRRPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SRRPF | 100% | N/A | ||
GLAI - SRRPF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
NTIP - SRRPF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RGP - SRRPF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.91% | ||
SOMLY - SRRPF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
WOLTF - SRRPF | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that WOLTF and KBRLF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WOLTF and KBRLF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WOLTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WOLTF | 100% | +0.23% | ||
KBRLF - WOLTF | 21% Poorly correlated | +8.66% | ||
SPIR - WOLTF | 10% Poorly correlated | -11.38% | ||
VMTG - WOLTF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TOPPY - WOLTF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
YUMM - WOLTF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |