SRRLF
Price
$1.34
Change
+$0.31 (+30.10%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
SURDF
Price
$38.69
Change
+$2.72 (+7.56%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
12.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRRLF vs SURDF

Header iconSRRLF vs SURDF Comparison
Open Charts SRRLF vs SURDFBanner chart's image
SIRIUS REAL ESTATE
Price$1.34
Change+$0.31 (+30.10%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization1.25B
Sumitomo Realty & Development
Price$38.69
Change+$2.72 (+7.56%)
Volume$706
Capitalization12.81B
SRRLF vs SURDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SURDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRRLF vs. SURDF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRRLF is a Hold and SURDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SRRLF: $1.34 vs. SURDF: $38.69)
Brand notoriety: SRRLF and SURDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRRLF: 212% vs. SURDF: 138%
Market capitalization -- SRRLF: $1.25B vs. SURDF: $12.81B
SRRLF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.25B. SURDF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $12.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRRLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSURDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SRRLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SURDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SURDF is a better buy in the long-term than SRRLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRRLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SURDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRRLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SURDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SURDF is a better buy in the short-term than SRRLF.

Price Growth

SRRLF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SURDF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SURDF($12.8B) has a higher market cap than SRRLF($1.25B). SRRLF has higher P/E ratio than SURDF: SRRLF (15.22) vs SURDF (10.91). SURDF YTD gains are higher at: 22.474 vs. SRRLF (14.451). SURDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 247B vs. SRRLF (111M). SURDF has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. SRRLF (99.2M). SRRLF has less debt than SURDF: SRRLF (1B) vs SURDF (3.68T). SURDF has higher revenues than SRRLF: SURDF (925B) vs SRRLF (270M).
SRRLFSURDFSRRLF / SURDF
Capitalization1.25B12.8B10%
EBITDA111M247B0%
Gain YTD14.45122.47464%
P/E Ratio15.2210.91140%
Revenue270M925B0%
Total Cash99.2M161B0%
Total Debt1B3.68T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SURDF: Fundamental Ratings
SURDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRRLFSURDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SURDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIASP25.25N/A
N/A
Via Renewables
RHI39.81-0.03
-0.08%
Robert Half
BODI4.61-0.06
-1.28%
Beachbody Company (The)
VEON54.08-1.65
-2.96%
VEON Ltd
HUMA2.53-0.14
-5.24%
Humacyte

SRRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRRLF has been loosely correlated with SURDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRRLF jumps, then SURDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRRLF
1D Price
Change %
SRRLF100%
N/A
SURDF - SRRLF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HUFAF - SRRLF
33%
Poorly correlated
+6.15%
CLLNY - SRRLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
MITEF - SRRLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTOUF - SRRLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SURDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SURDF has been loosely correlated with SRRLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SURDF jumps, then SRRLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SURDF
1D Price
Change %
SURDF100%
N/A
SRRLF - SURDF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTOUF - SURDF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRGTF - SURDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITEF - SURDF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRUNF - SURDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More