SRLZF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.39M
SXOOF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
24.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRLZF vs SXOOF

Header iconSRLZF vs SXOOF Comparison
Open Charts SRLZF vs SXOOFBanner chart's image
Salazar Resources
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization10.39M
St Georges Eco Mng
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization24.01M
SRLZF vs SXOOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRLZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRLZF vs. SXOOF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRLZF is a Hold and SXOOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SRLZF: $0.11 vs. SXOOF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: SRLZF and SXOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRLZF: 0% vs. SXOOF: 2%
Market capitalization -- SRLZF: $10.39M vs. SXOOF: $24.01M
SRLZF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.39M. SXOOF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $24.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRLZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSXOOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SRLZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SXOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRLZF is a better buy in the long-term than SXOOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRLZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SXOOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRLZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SXOOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRLZF is a better buy in the short-term than SXOOF.

Price Growth

SRLZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.11% price change this week, while SXOOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SXOOF($24M) has a higher market cap than SRLZF($10.4M). SRLZF YTD gains are higher at: 106.717 vs. SXOOF (21.667). SRLZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.76M vs. SXOOF (-9.5M). SXOOF has more cash in the bank: 3.86M vs. SRLZF (1.71M). SRLZF (0) and SXOOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SRLZFSXOOFSRLZF / SXOOF
Capitalization10.4M24M43%
EBITDA-1.76M-9.5M18%
Gain YTD106.71721.667493%
P/E Ratio6.57N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.71M3.86M44%
Total DebtN/A11.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRLZF vs SXOOF: Fundamental Ratings
SRLZF
SXOOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5016
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
9477
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRLZF's Valuation (98) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (98). This means that SRLZF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as SRLZF (100). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to SRLZF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SRLZF (94). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to SRLZF’s over the last 12 months.

SRLZF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (64). This means that SRLZF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as SRLZF (94). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to SRLZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRLZFSXOOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRLZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMMCF0.170.01
+6.29%
Pampa Metals Corporation
PXXLF0.25N/A
N/A
Poxel SA
GLAPY71.00N/A
N/A
Glanbia Plc
HNTIF4.10N/A
N/A
Hunting Group Plc.
PUBGY27.17-0.40
-1.45%
Publicis Groupe S.A.

SRLZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRLZF and IVPAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRLZF and IVPAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRLZF
1D Price
Change %
SRLZF100%
N/A
IVPAF - SRLZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
ERMAY - SRLZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SXOOF - SRLZF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.31%
SOUHY - SRLZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
STRPF - SRLZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
More

SXOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SXOOF and MNXXF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SXOOF and MNXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXOOF
1D Price
Change %
SXOOF100%
+6.31%
MNXXF - SXOOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
SRCAF - SXOOF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGRF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.02%
SRLZF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCKRF - SXOOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More