Advertisement
SRHBY vs TCMFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRHBY is a Hold and TCMFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SRHBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTCMFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SRHBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TCMFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SRHBY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCMFF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SRHBY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TCMFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
SRHBY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TCMFF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -26.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.59%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (-0.33% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| SRHBY | TCMFF | SRHBY / TCMFF | |
| Capitalization | 1.51B | 3.72B | 41% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.28T | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.472 | -50.385 | -29% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.68 | 93.83 | 20% |
| Revenue | N/A | 5.17T | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 369B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 4.74T | - |
SRHBY | TCMFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SRHBY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCMFF (80). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.
SRHBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCMFF (100). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew significantly faster than TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.
SRHBY's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCMFF (87). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.
TCMFF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SRHBY (50). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew similarly to SRHBY’s over the last 12 months.
TCMFF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SRHBY (26). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew similarly to SRHBY’s over the last 12 months.
| SRHBY | TCMFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 15% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 9% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | 4 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | 4 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MULL | 22.90 | 2.27 | +11.00% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | |||
| GOVI | 27.76 | 0.26 | +0.96% |
| Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Years Trs ETF | |||
| OAIM | 39.04 | 0.32 | +0.83% |
| OneAscent International Equity ETF | |||
| LIAX | 248.44 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2063 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF | |||
| PUI | 43.15 | -0.08 | -0.18% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Utilities Momt ETF | |||
SRHBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SRHBY and TCMFF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRHBY and TCMFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SRHBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRHBY | 100% | N/A | ||
| TCMFF - SRHBY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TIAIY - SRHBY | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SMNUF - SRHBY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNGNF - SRHBY | -0% Poorly correlated | -6.25% | ||
| TELNF - SRHBY | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||
TCMFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCMFF has been loosely correlated with SMNUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TCMFF jumps, then SMNUF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCMFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCMFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SMNUF - TCMFF | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TLKMF - TCMFF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IQST - TCMFF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.81% | ||
| SRHBY - TCMFF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TELDF - TCMFF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||