SRHBY
Price
$8.80
Change
-$1.06 (-10.75%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
TCMFF
Price
$1.35
Change
+$0.15 (+12.50%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRHBY vs TCMFF

Header iconSRHBY vs TCMFF Comparison
Open Charts SRHBY vs TCMFFBanner chart's image
Starhub
Price$8.80
Change-$1.06 (-10.75%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.49B
Telecom Argentina S.A
Price$1.35
Change+$0.15 (+12.50%)
Volume$2.7K
Capitalization3.47B
SRHBY vs TCMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRHBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRHBY vs. TCMFF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRHBY is a Hold and TCMFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SRHBY: $8.80 vs. TCMFF: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: SRHBY and TCMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRHBY: 28% vs. TCMFF: 390%
Market capitalization -- SRHBY: $1.49B vs. TCMFF: $3.47B
SRHBY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.49B. TCMFF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRHBY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTCMFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SRHBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TCMFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRHBY is a better buy in the long-term than TCMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRHBY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCMFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRHBY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TCMFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TCMFF is a better buy in the short-term than SRHBY.

Price Growth

SRHBY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -6.31% price change this week, while TCMFF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +17.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.03% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCMFF($3.47B) has a higher market cap than SRHBY($1.49B). TCMFF has higher P/E ratio than SRHBY: TCMFF (93.83) vs SRHBY (16.67). SRHBY YTD gains are higher at: 7.243 vs. TCMFF (-48.077).
SRHBYTCMFFSRHBY / TCMFF
Capitalization1.49B3.47B43%
EBITDAN/A1.28T-
Gain YTD7.243-48.077-15%
P/E Ratio16.6793.8318%
RevenueN/A5.17T-
Total CashN/A369B-
Total DebtN/A4.74T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRHBY vs TCMFF: Fundamental Ratings
SRHBY
TCMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
5086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6134
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
331
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3855

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRHBY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCMFF (80). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.

SRHBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCMFF (100). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew significantly faster than TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.

SRHBY's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCMFF (86). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TCMFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SRHBY (61). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew similarly to SRHBY’s over the last 12 months.

TCMFF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SRHBY (33). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew similarly to SRHBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRHBYTCMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRHBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FKCSX41.160.38
+0.93%
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap C
IRSAX15.510.14
+0.91%
Macquarie Real Estate Securities A
VAPPX23.330.15
+0.65%
VALIC Company I Capital Appreciation
SSLCX54.500.28
+0.52%
DWS Small Cap Core S
CBFFX40.770.18
+0.44%
American Funds Global Balanced 529F1

SRHBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRHBY and TCMFF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRHBY and TCMFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRHBY
1D Price
Change %
SRHBY100%
N/A
TCMFF - SRHBY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAIY - SRHBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
SMNUF - SRHBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNGNF - SRHBY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TELNF - SRHBY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TCMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCMFF has been loosely correlated with SMNUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TCMFF jumps, then SMNUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCMFF
1D Price
Change %
TCMFF100%
N/A
SMNUF - TCMFF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TLKMF - TCMFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IQST - TCMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
SRHBY - TCMFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TELDF - TCMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More