SRCGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.98M
SXOOF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRCGF vs SXOOF

Header iconSRCGF vs SXOOF Comparison
Open Charts SRCGF vs SXOOFBanner chart's image
HOMELAND NICKEL
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$209K
Capitalization12.98M
St Georges Eco Mng
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$17.49K
Capitalization14.69M
SRCGF vs SXOOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRCGF vs. SXOOF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRCGF is a Hold and SXOOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SRCGF: $0.06 vs. SXOOF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: SRCGF and SXOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRCGF: 277% vs. SXOOF: 23%
Market capitalization -- SRCGF: $12.98M vs. SXOOF: $14.69M
SRCGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $12.98M. SXOOF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $14.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRCGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSXOOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SRCGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SXOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRCGF is a better buy in the long-term than SXOOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRCGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SXOOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRCGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SXOOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SXOOF is a better buy in the short-term than SRCGF.

Price Growth

SRCGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.23% price change this week, while SXOOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -10.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.43% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SXOOF($14.7M) has a higher market cap than SRCGF($13M). SXOOF has higher P/E ratio than SRCGF: SXOOF (1.99) vs SRCGF (1.26). SRCGF YTD gains are higher at: 328.000 vs. SXOOF (14.167). SRCGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.89M vs. SXOOF (-8.94M). SRCGF has more cash in the bank: 3.82M vs. SXOOF (639K). SRCGF (0) and SXOOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SRCGFSXOOFSRCGF / SXOOF
Capitalization13M14.7M88%
EBITDA-1.89M-8.94M21%
Gain YTD328.00014.1672,315%
P/E Ratio1.261.9963%
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.82M639K598%
Total DebtN/A1.85M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRCGF vs SXOOF: Fundamental Ratings
SRCGF
SXOOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
9778
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3684
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRCGF's Valuation (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (98). This means that SRCGF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (100). This means that SRCGF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCGF (97). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to SRCGF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SXOOF (84). This means that SRCGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCGF (100). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to SRCGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRCGFSXOOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMCLF0.24N/A
N/A
Baic Mtr Corp Ltd
LCMRF2.25N/A
N/A
La Comer SAB De CV
CZASF0.01N/A
N/A
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.
DWHHF24.28N/A
N/A
Deutsche Wohnen SE
IEGCF0.09N/A
-2.73%
Independence Gold Corp.

SRCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRCGF and WTRNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRCGF and WTRNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCGF
1D Price
Change %
SRCGF100%
-5.40%
WTRNF - SRCGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMYLF - SRCGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADBRF - SRCGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
SXOOF - SRCGF
8%
Poorly correlated
-12.63%
NILIF - SRCGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
More

SXOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SXOOF and MNXXF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SXOOF and MNXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXOOF
1D Price
Change %
SXOOF100%
-12.63%
MNXXF - SXOOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
SRCAF - SXOOF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGRF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
SRLZF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCKRF - SXOOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More