SRBT
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.09 (+29.03%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
380.98K
SREDF
Price
$10.75
Change
-$0.62 (-5.45%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
6.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRBT vs SREDF

Header iconSRBT vs SREDF Comparison
Open Charts SRBT vs SREDFBanner chart's image
Shanrong Biotechnology
Price$0.40
Change+$0.09 (+29.03%)
Volume$750
Capitalization380.98K
StoreBrand ASA
Price$10.75
Change-$0.62 (-5.45%)
Volume$568
Capitalization6.04B
SRBT vs SREDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SREDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRBT vs. SREDF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRBT is a Hold and SREDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SRBT: $0.40 vs. SREDF: $10.75)
Brand notoriety: SRBT and SREDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRBT: 60% vs. SREDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SRBT: $380.98K vs. SREDF: $6.04B
SRBT [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $380.98K. SREDF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $6.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSREDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SRBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SREDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SREDF is a better buy in the long-term than SRBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRBT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SREDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRBT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SREDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SREDF is a better buy in the short-term than SRBT.

Price Growth

SRBT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -13.05% price change this week, while SREDF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.67% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SREDF($6.04B) has a higher market cap than SRBT($381K). SRBT YTD gains are higher at: 316.250 vs. SREDF (-3.932).
SRBTSREDFSRBT / SREDF
Capitalization381K6.04B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD316.250-3.932-8,043%
P/E RatioN/A8.52-
RevenueN/A42.7B-
Total CashN/A18.1B-
Total DebtN/A54.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRBT vs SREDF: Fundamental Ratings
SRBT
SREDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9418
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10094
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SREDF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBT (45). This means that SREDF’s stock grew similarly to SRBT’s over the last 12 months.

SREDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SRBT (94). This means that SREDF’s stock grew significantly faster than SRBT’s over the last 12 months.

SREDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBT (100). This means that SREDF’s stock grew similarly to SRBT’s over the last 12 months.

SRBT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SREDF (60). This means that SRBT’s stock grew similarly to SREDF’s over the last 12 months.

SREDF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBT (100). This means that SREDF’s stock grew similarly to SRBT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRBTSREDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SREDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIFD31.040.68
+2.24%
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
APRH24.760.02
+0.08%
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Apr
UCRD21.49N/A
N/A
VictoryShares Corporate Bond ETF
IEO91.14-0.09
-0.10%
iShares US Oil & Gas Explor & Prod ETF
BITB59.48-0.26
-0.44%
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF

SRBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRBT and TCRI have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRBT and TCRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRBT
1D Price
Change %
SRBT100%
N/A
TCRI - SRBT
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IWSH - SRBT
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - SRBT
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHLT - SRBT
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SREDF - SRBT
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SREDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SREDF and PLMIU have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SREDF and PLMIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SREDF
1D Price
Change %
SREDF100%
N/A
PLMIU - SREDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DHCC - SREDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-23.26%
KACLF - SREDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - SREDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STJO - SREDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More