SRBIF
Price
$3.40
Change
+$0.05 (+1.49%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
250.83M
64 days until earnings call
ZIJMY
Price
$77.91
Change
+$1.00 (+1.30%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
97.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRBIF vs ZIJMY

Header iconSRBIF vs ZIJMY Comparison
Open Charts SRBIF vs ZIJMYBanner chart's image
Serabi Gold
Price$3.40
Change+$0.05 (+1.49%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization250.83M
Zijin Mining Group
Price$77.91
Change+$1.00 (+1.30%)
Volume$8.29K
Capitalization97.6B
SRBIF vs ZIJMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZIJMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRBIF vs. ZIJMY commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRBIF is a Hold and ZIJMY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (SRBIF: $3.40 vs. ZIJMY: $77.91)
Brand notoriety: SRBIF and ZIJMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRBIF: 26% vs. ZIJMY: 66%
Market capitalization -- SRBIF: $250.83M vs. ZIJMY: $97.6B
SRBIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $250.83M. ZIJMY’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $97.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRBIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZIJMY’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • SRBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZIJMY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZIJMY is a better buy in the long-term than SRBIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRBIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZIJMY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRBIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZIJMY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRBIF is a better buy in the short-term than ZIJMY.

Price Growth

SRBIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.68% price change this week, while ZIJMY (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

SRBIF is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.35% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZIJMY($97.6B) has a higher market cap than SRBIF($251M). ZIJMY has higher P/E ratio than SRBIF: ZIJMY (18.64) vs SRBIF (6.86). SRBIF YTD gains are higher at: 138.597 vs. ZIJMY (114.575).
SRBIFZIJMYSRBIF / ZIJMY
Capitalization251M97.6B0%
EBITDA51.7MN/A-
Gain YTD138.597114.575121%
P/E Ratio6.8618.6437%
Revenue114MN/A-
Total Cash30.4MN/A-
Total Debt5.53MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRBIF vs ZIJMY: Fundamental Ratings
SRBIF
ZIJMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8687
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
345
SMR RATING
1..100
2932
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZIJMY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRBIF (56). This means that ZIJMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRBIF’s over the last 12 months.

ZIJMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBIF (34). This means that ZIJMY’s stock grew similarly to SRBIF’s over the last 12 months.

SRBIF's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as ZIJMY (32). This means that SRBIF’s stock grew similarly to ZIJMY’s over the last 12 months.

SRBIF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ZIJMY (37). This means that SRBIF’s stock grew similarly to ZIJMY’s over the last 12 months.

ZIJMY's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRBIF (70). This means that ZIJMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRBIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRBIFZIJMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZIJMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MENRX9.790.03
+0.31%
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income R6
FETKX29.95N/A
N/A
Fidelity Equity Dividend Income K
FVLAX20.50N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value Leaders A
BGAIX47.93-0.46
-0.95%
Baron Global Advantage Institutional
CBSAX27.91-0.29
-1.03%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund A

SRBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRBIF and ZIJMY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRBIF and ZIJMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRBIF
1D Price
Change %
SRBIF100%
+1.49%
ZIJMY - SRBIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
GNSMF - SRBIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLBKF - SRBIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A

ZIJMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZIJMY has been loosely correlated with GLBKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZIJMY jumps, then GLBKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZIJMY
1D Price
Change %
ZIJMY100%
+1.30%
GLBKF - ZIJMY
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZIJMF - ZIJMY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
BDLNF - ZIJMY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBIF - ZIJMY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
IMRFF - ZIJMY
10%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
More