SQ
Price
$83.42
Change
-$2.40 (-2.80%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
97 days until earnings call
ZM
Price
$82.63
Change
-$2.41 (-2.83%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
10 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SQ vs ZM

Header iconSQ vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts SQ vs ZMBanner chart's image
Block
Price$83.42
Change-$2.40 (-2.80%)
Volume$9.21M
CapitalizationN/A
Zoom Video Communications
Price$82.63
Change-$2.41 (-2.83%)
Volume$2.91M
CapitalizationN/A
SQ vs ZM Comparison Chart
Loading...
SQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SQ vs. ZM commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SQ is a Sell and ZM is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (SQ: $83.42 vs. ZM: $82.63)
Brand notoriety: SQ and ZM are both notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SQ: 134% vs. ZM: 109%
Market capitalization -- SQ: $52.08B vs. ZM: $20.11B
SQ [@Packaged Software] is valued at $52.08B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SQ is a better buy in the long-term than ZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SQ is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

SQ (@Packaged Software) experienced а +10.83% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

SQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SQ($52.1B) has a higher market cap than ZM($20.1B). SQ has higher P/E ratio than ZM: SQ (4073.00) vs ZM (31.27). ZM YTD gains are higher at: 14.908 vs. SQ (7.847). SQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 790M vs. ZM (630M). SQ has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. ZM (6.96B). ZM has less debt than SQ: ZM (73M) vs SQ (6.07B). SQ has higher revenues than ZM: SQ (21.9B) vs ZM (4.53B).
SQZMSQ / ZM
Capitalization52.1B20.1B259%
EBITDA790M630M125%
Gain YTD7.84714.90853%
P/E Ratio4073.0031.2713,025%
Revenue21.9B4.53B484%
Total Cash9.02B6.96B130%
Total Debt6.07B73M8,318%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQ: Fundamental Ratings
SQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SQZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

SQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQ has been loosely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SQ jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQ
1D Price
Change %
SQ100%
-2.80%
AFRM - SQ
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
BILL - SQ
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.67%
SSNC - SQ
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
QTWO - SQ
47%
Loosely correlated
-5.30%
OLO - SQ
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
More

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with RNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then RNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
-2.83%
RNG - ZM
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.16%
SSNC - ZM
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
CRM - ZM
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
OTEX - ZM
40%
Loosely correlated
-5.08%
SQ - ZM
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
More