Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPXL vs UWM
SPXL vs UWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPXL vs. UWM commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPXL is a Hold and UWM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXL has more net assets: 5.35B vs. UWM (340M). SPXL has a higher annual dividend yield than UWM: SPXL (14.960) vs UWM (-1.210). SPXL was incepted earlier than UWM: SPXL (17 years) vs UWM (19 years). SPXL (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than UWM (0.95). UWM has a higher turnover SPXL (29.00) vs SPXL (29.00).
| SPXL | UWM | SPXL / UWM | |
| Gain YTD | 14.960 | -1.210 | -1,236% |
| Net Assets | 5.35B | 340M | 1,574% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.95 | 92% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 40.00 | 73% |
| Yield | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SPXL | UWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SPXL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPXL has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPXL jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPXL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPXL | 100% | -0.73% | ||
| MSFT - SPXL | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AAPL - SPXL | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| AMZN - SPXL | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| META - SPXL | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| NVDA - SPXL | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
UWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UWM has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UWM jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWM | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| FIX - UWM | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ONTO - UWM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| SMCI - UWM | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| ELF - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
| MSTR - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.78% |