SPWH
Price
$3.04
Change
+$0.09 (+3.05%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
116.83M
67 days until earnings call
TLF
Price
$3.05
Change
+$0.02 (+0.66%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
24.61M
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPWH vs TLF

Header iconSPWH vs TLF Comparison
Open Charts SPWH vs TLFBanner chart's image
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings
Price$3.04
Change+$0.09 (+3.05%)
Volume$192.32K
Capitalization116.83M
Tandy Leather Factory
Price$3.05
Change+$0.02 (+0.66%)
Volume$6.9K
Capitalization24.61M
SPWH vs TLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SPWH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SPWH vs. TLF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPWH is a Buy and TLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SPWH: $3.04 vs. TLF: $3.05)
Brand notoriety: SPWH and TLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SPWH: 44% vs. TLF: 44%
Market capitalization -- SPWH: $116.83M vs. TLF: $24.61M
SPWH [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $116.83M. TLF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $24.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SPWH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SPWH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLF is a better buy in the long-term than SPWH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPWH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SPWH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TLF is a better buy in the short-term than SPWH.

Price Growth

SPWH (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -1.30% price change this week, while TLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

SPWH is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

TLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.92% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPWH($117M) has a higher market cap than TLF($24.6M). SPWH YTD gains are higher at: 13.858 vs. TLF (-11.960). SPWH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.4M vs. TLF (5.3M). TLF has more cash in the bank: 16.4M vs. SPWH (1.8M). TLF has less debt than SPWH: TLF (11.4M) vs SPWH (551M). SPWH has higher revenues than TLF: SPWH (1.21B) vs TLF (74.6M).
SPWHTLFSPWH / TLF
Capitalization117M24.6M476%
EBITDA23.4M5.3M441%
Gain YTD13.858-11.960-116%
P/E RatioN/A38.13-
Revenue1.21B74.6M1,619%
Total Cash1.8M16.4M11%
Total Debt551M11.4M4,833%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPWH vs TLF: Fundamental Ratings
SPWH
TLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
687
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
9542
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TLF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SPWH (58) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to SPWH’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPWH (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPWH’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPWH (95) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPWH’s over the last 12 months.

SPWH's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TLF (60) in the null industry. This means that SPWH’s stock grew similarly to TLF’s over the last 12 months.

SPWH's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TLF (4) in the null industry. This means that SPWH’s stock grew similarly to TLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPWHTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPWH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNES4.640.24
+5.45%
SenesTech Inc.
SLB35.520.93
+2.69%
Schlumberger Limited
CDXS2.460.06
+2.50%
Codexis
AHG1.740.03
+2.02%
Akso Health Group ADS
NNI126.140.06
+0.05%
Nelnet

SPWH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPWH and RH have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPWH and RH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPWH
1D Price
Change %
SPWH100%
+3.05%
RH - SPWH
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
ASO - SPWH
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.29%
FIVE - SPWH
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
CWH - SPWH
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
DKS - SPWH
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More

TLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLF and LESL have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLF and LESL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLF
1D Price
Change %
TLF100%
+0.66%
LESL - TLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-6.22%
SPWH - TLF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
CHPT - TLF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
SNROF - TLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASO - TLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.29%
More