SPNUF
Price
$2.24
Change
+$0.08 (+3.70%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.28B
TDCSF
Price
$7.92
Change
+$0.60 (+8.20%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
329.32M
Ad is loading...

SPNUF vs TDCSF

Header iconSPNUF vs TDCSF Comparison
Open Charts SPNUF vs TDCSFBanner chart's image
Spirent Communications
Price$2.24
Change+$0.08 (+3.70%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.28B
Tdc Software Engineering
Price$7.92
Change+$0.60 (+8.20%)
Volume$500
Capitalization329.32M
SPNUF vs TDCSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SPNUF vs. TDCSF commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPNUF is a Hold and TDCSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SPNUF: $2.24 vs. TDCSF: $7.92)
Brand notoriety: SPNUF and TDCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SPNUF: 11% vs. TDCSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SPNUF: $1.28B vs. TDCSF: $329.32M
SPNUF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.28B. TDCSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $329.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SPNUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTDCSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SPNUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TDCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TDCSF is a better buy in the long-term than SPNUF.

Price Growth

SPNUF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TDCSF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.66% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPNUF($1.28B) has a higher market cap than TDCSF($329M). TDCSF has higher P/E ratio than SPNUF: TDCSF (15.70) vs SPNUF (13.44). SPNUF (0.000) and TDCSF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . TDCSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.54B vs. SPNUF (135M). TDCSF has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. SPNUF (189M). SPNUF has less debt than TDCSF: SPNUF (25.5M) vs TDCSF (900M). TDCSF has higher revenues than SPNUF: TDCSF (34.2B) vs SPNUF (601M).
SPNUFTDCSFSPNUF / TDCSF
Capitalization1.28B329M390%
EBITDA135M3.54B4%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio13.4415.7086%
Revenue601M34.2B2%
Total Cash189M11.7B2%
Total Debt25.5M900M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPNUF: Fundamental Ratings
SPNUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
44
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

SPNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPNUF has been closely correlated with SPMYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPNUF jumps, then SPMYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPNUF
1D Price
Change %
SPNUF100%
N/A
SPMYY - SPNUF
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
VERB - SPNUF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
CVOSF - SPNUF
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STRM - SPNUF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
TDCSF - SPNUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TDCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDCSF has been closely correlated with JAPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TDCSF jumps, then JAPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDCSF
1D Price
Change %
TDCSF100%
N/A
JAPPF - TDCSF
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
MRIN - TDCSF
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
PSHPF - TDCSF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPNAF - TDCSF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPNUF - TDCSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More