Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPNNX vs TMLAX
SPNNX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPNNX vs. TMLAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPNNX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPNNX has more cash in the bank: 4.05B vs. TMLAX (127M). SPNNX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: SPNNX (7.69) vs TMLAX (4.08). SPNNX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SPNNX (7 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). SPNNX (9.27) is less costly to investors than TMLAX (1.56). TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. SPNNX (11.00). SPNNX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SPNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. TMLAX (-0.06). SPNNX return over 5 years is better than : 163.61 vs. TMLAX (76.29).
| SPNNX | TMLAX | SPNNX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 9.27 | 1.56 | 594% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 9.27 | 1.56 | 594% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.301 | 1.714 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.05B | 127M | 3,190% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.69 | 4.08 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | -0.06 | -8,927% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.50 | 46.83 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 163.61 | 76.29 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 118.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement