SPKLU
Price
$11.10
Change
+$0.31 (+2.87%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
UMAC
Price
$8.73
Change
+$0.76 (+9.54%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.89M
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPKLU vs UMAC

Header iconSPKLU vs UMAC Comparison
Open Charts SPKLU vs UMACBanner chart's image
Spark I Acquisition
Price$11.10
Change+$0.31 (+2.87%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Unusual Machines
Price$8.73
Change+$0.76 (+9.54%)
Volume$2.5M
Capitalization15.89M
SPKLU vs UMAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SPKLU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SPKLU vs. UMAC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPKLU is a Hold and UMAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SPKLU: $10.79)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SPKLU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • SPKLU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPKLU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SPKLU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UMAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SPKLU is a better buy in the short-term than UMAC.

Price Growth

SPKLU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPKLU YTD gains are higher at: -5.929 vs. UMAC (-48.098). SPKLU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.69M vs. UMAC (-1.79M). UMAC has more cash in the bank: 895K vs. SPKLU (114K). SPKLU (0) and UMAC (0) have equivalent revenues.
SPKLUUMACSPKLU / UMAC
CapitalizationN/A15.9M-
EBITDA-1.69M-1.79M94%
Gain YTD-5.929-48.09812%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash114K895K13%
Total Debt3.76MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPKLUUMAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPKLU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTCI4.940.24
+5.11%
FTC Solar
SENEB107.994.99
+4.84%
Seneca Foods Corp
COHR90.902.54
+2.87%
Coherent Corp
FOLD6.100.15
+2.52%
Amicus Therapeutics
AIRTP17.160.03
+0.18%
Air T

SPKLU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPKLU and NHIC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPKLU and NHIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPKLU
1D Price
Change %
SPKLU100%
N/A
NHIC - SPKLU
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
UMAC - SPKLU
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.51%
DMYY - SPKLU
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
NETDU - SPKLU
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRLU - SPKLU
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UMAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UMAC and FRHC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UMAC and FRHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMAC
1D Price
Change %
UMAC100%
+7.51%
FRHC - UMAC
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
SPKLU - UMAC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IX - UMAC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
ISRLU - UMAC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TREE - UMAC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More