Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPAM vs XLK
SPAM vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts SPAM vs XLK
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$34.42
Change-$0.28 (-0.81%)
Volume$998
Net Assets2.06M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$285.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.18%)
Volume$12.76M
Net Assets91.26B
SPAM vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPAM vs. XLK commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPAM is a Hold and XLK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 91.3B vs. SPAM (2.06M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than SPAM: XLK (23.151) vs SPAM (17.223). SPAM was incepted earlier than XLK: SPAM (2 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SPAM (0.35). XLK has a higher turnover SPAM (24.00) vs SPAM (24.00).
| SPAM | XLK | SPAM / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 17.223 | 23.151 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 2.06M | 91.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.08 | 438% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 39.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 0.11 | 0.54 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SPAM | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 10 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and BAH have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and BAH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -0.79% | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| RDWR - SPAM | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| FSLY - SPAM | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| OKTA - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| NVDA - XLK | 84% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 78% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| APH - XLK | 77% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 76% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| MSFT - XLK | 75% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||