Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPAM vs XLK
SPAM vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts SPAM vs XLK
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$32.83
Change+$0.23 (+0.71%)
Volume$1.27K
Net Assets1.96M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$260.37
Change+$1.56 (+0.60%)
Volume$30.89K
Net Assets83.06B
SPAM vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPAM vs. XLK commentary
Jul 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPAM is a Buy and XLK is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 83.1B vs. SPAM (1.96M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than SPAM: XLK (11.687) vs SPAM (10.992). SPAM was incepted earlier than XLK: SPAM (2 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SPAM (0.35). XLK has a higher turnover SPAM (24.00) vs SPAM (24.00).
| SPAM | XLK | SPAM / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 10.992 | 11.687 | 94% |
| Net Assets | 1.96M | 83.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.08 | 438% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 39.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 0.11 | 0.61 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SPAM | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 68% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPAM has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPAM jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| PANW - SPAM | 73% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| ZS - SPAM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| CYBR - SPAM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| S - SPAM | 67% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| CRWD - SPAM | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | -0.93% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 83% Closely correlated | -3.98% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| MSFT - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| CDNS - XLK | 77% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| AVGO - XLK | 77% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
More | ||||