Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPAM vs XLK
SPAM vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts SPAM vs XLK
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$31.57
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
Volume$237
Net Assets2.53M
State Street®TechSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$144.70
Change-$1.78 (-1.22%)
Volume$61.95K
Net Assets93.85B
SPAM vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPAM vs. XLK commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPAM is a Hold and XLK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 93.9B vs. SPAM (2.53M). SPAM has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: SPAM (3.163) vs XLK (1.743). SPAM was incepted earlier than XLK: SPAM (2 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SPAM (0.35). SPAM has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
| SPAM | XLK | SPAM / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 3.163 | 1.743 | 181% |
| Net Assets | 2.53M | 93.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.08 | 438% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 5.00 | 760% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.54 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SPAM | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and BAH have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and BAH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -1.33% | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
| RDWR - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| FSLY - SPAM | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| OKTA - SPAM | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| NVDA - XLK | 84% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| TRMB - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
More | ||||