Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPAM vs VGT
SPAM vs VGT Comparison
Open Charts SPAM vs VGT
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$32.83
Change+$0.23 (+0.71%)
Volume$1.27K
Net Assets1.96M
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
Price$684.42
Change+$4.63 (+0.68%)
Volume$3.13K
Net Assets109.7B
SPAM vs VGT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPAM vs. VGT commentary
Jul 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPAM is a Buy and VGT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 110B vs. SPAM (1.96M). SPAM has a higher annual dividend yield than VGT: SPAM (10.992) vs VGT (9.326). SPAM was incepted earlier than VGT: SPAM (2 years) vs VGT (22 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than SPAM (0.35). SPAM has a higher turnover VGT (13.00) vs VGT (13.00).
| SPAM | VGT | SPAM / VGT | |
| Gain YTD | 10.992 | 9.326 | 118% |
| Net Assets | 1.96M | 110B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.09 | 389% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 13.00 | 185% |
| Yield | 0.11 | 0.47 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SPAM | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 68% | 13 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPAM has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPAM jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| PANW - SPAM | 73% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| ZS - SPAM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| CYBR - SPAM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| S - SPAM | 67% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| CRWD - SPAM | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||
VGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGT has been closely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VGT jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGT | 100% | -0.98% | ||
| MKSI - VGT | 82% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| LRCX - VGT | 81% Closely correlated | -3.98% | ||
| RMBS - VGT | 81% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| MTSI - VGT | 79% Closely correlated | -2.72% | ||
| ENTG - VGT | 79% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||