SOSCF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
14M
YMZBY
Price
$180.00
Change
+$27.25 (+17.84%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.81B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SOSCF vs YMZBY

Header iconSOSCF vs YMZBY Comparison
Open Charts SOSCF vs YMZBYBanner chart's image
Deoleo SA
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$450
Capitalization14M
Yamazaki Baking
Price$180.00
Change+$27.25 (+17.84%)
Volume$3
Capitalization3.81B
SOSCF vs YMZBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
YMZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SOSCF vs. YMZBY commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOSCF is a Hold and YMZBY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SOSCF: $0.25 vs. YMZBY: $180.00)
Brand notoriety: SOSCF and YMZBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SOSCF: 100% vs. YMZBY: 288%
Market capitalization -- SOSCF: $14M vs. YMZBY: $3.81B
SOSCF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14M. YMZBY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $3.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SOSCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYMZBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SOSCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YMZBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, YMZBY is a better buy in the long-term than SOSCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

YMZBY’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • YMZBY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

SOSCF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while YMZBY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +17.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

YMZBY is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YMZBY($3.81B) has a higher market cap than SOSCF($14M). YMZBY has higher P/E ratio than SOSCF: YMZBY (44.26) vs SOSCF (0.11). YMZBY YTD gains are higher at: 17.840 vs. SOSCF (0.000). YMZBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 549M vs. SOSCF (107M). YMZBY has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. SOSCF (86.4M). SOSCF has less debt than YMZBY: SOSCF (269M) vs YMZBY (848M). YMZBY has higher revenues than SOSCF: YMZBY (9.57B) vs SOSCF (759M).
SOSCFYMZBYSOSCF / YMZBY
Capitalization14M3.81B0%
EBITDA107M549M19%
Gain YTD0.00017.840-
P/E Ratio0.1144.260%
Revenue759M9.57B8%
Total Cash86.4M1.25B7%
Total Debt269M848M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SOSCF vs YMZBY: Fundamental Ratings
SOSCF
YMZBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3435
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9297
SMR RATING
1..100
9310
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5470
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YMZBY's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SOSCF (65). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to SOSCF’s over the last 12 months.

SOSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as YMZBY (97). This means that SOSCF’s stock grew similarly to YMZBY’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOSCF (93). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew significantly faster than SOSCF’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SOSCF (70). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to SOSCF’s over the last 12 months.

SOSCF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as YMZBY (70). This means that SOSCF’s stock grew similarly to YMZBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SOSCFYMZBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
YMZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMZ10.320.04
+0.39%
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund
CGIB25.18N/A
+0.01%
Capital Group Intl Bd ETF USD-Hdg
PMM5.91N/A
N/A
Putnam Managed Municipal Income
AGRH25.88N/A
N/A
iShares Interest Rt Hdg U.S. Aggt Bd ETF
TDSB22.19-0.07
-0.34%
Cabana Target Beta ETF

SOSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOSCF and CENTA have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOSCF and CENTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOSCF
1D Price
Change %
SOSCF100%
N/A
CENTA - SOSCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
CENT - SOSCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
MEJHY - SOSCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YMZBY - SOSCF
0%
Poorly correlated
+17.84%
JWLLF - SOSCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

YMZBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YMZBY and WLMIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YMZBY and WLMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YMZBY
1D Price
Change %
YMZBY100%
+17.84%
WLMIF - YMZBY
25%
Poorly correlated
+8.10%
CELV - YMZBY
20%
Poorly correlated
-12.24%
RRSFF - YMZBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - YMZBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JWLLF - YMZBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More