Advertisement
SOOBF vs STBFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOOBF is a StrongBuy and STBFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SOOBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTBFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SOOBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STBFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
SOOBF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STBFF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.57%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+2.19% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.56% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| SOOBF | STBFF | SOOBF / STBFF | |
| Capitalization | 4.12B | 10B | 41% |
| EBITDA | 35.5B | 235B | 15% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 172.33 | 16.69 | 1,032% |
| Revenue | 528B | 1.69T | 31% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 147B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 48.2B | - |
SOOBF | STBFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STBFF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as SOOBF (59). This means that STBFF’s stock grew similarly to SOOBF’s over the last 12 months.
SOOBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STBFF (100). This means that SOOBF’s stock grew significantly faster than STBFF’s over the last 12 months.
STBFF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as SOOBF (100). This means that STBFF’s stock grew similarly to SOOBF’s over the last 12 months.
SOOBF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as STBFF (71). This means that SOOBF’s stock grew similarly to STBFF’s over the last 12 months.
STBFF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SOOBF (51). This means that STBFF’s stock grew similarly to SOOBF’s over the last 12 months.
| SOOBF | STBFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% | 2 days ago 15% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% | 2 days ago 15% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
SOOBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SOOBF and SBEV have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOOBF and SBEV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOOBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOOBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SBEV - SOOBF | 1% Poorly correlated | -15.44% | ||
| PDRDF - SOOBF | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.52% | ||
| MXGBF - SOOBF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| STBFF - SOOBF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| REMYF - SOOBF | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||
STBFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STBFF has been loosely correlated with CATWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STBFF jumps, then CATWF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STBFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STBFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CATWF - STBFF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| STBFY - STBFF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| SBEV - STBFF | 8% Poorly correlated | -15.44% | ||
| TSRYY - STBFF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
| TSGTF - STBFF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||